All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw-DcQCyzbjH0jQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
Cc: adq_dvb-fmPXVN3awWJAJAzL26g0SA@public.gmane.org,
	rl-7uj+XXdSDtwfv37vnLkPlQ@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [ACPI] Where do I send APIC victims?
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:53:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030903145356.35b9a192.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1062589205.19059.6.camel-Z+iYsftfazAXoXS6vNje7nviChZXdy279dF7HbQ/qKg@public.gmane.org>

On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:40:06 +0100
Alan Cox <alan-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> On Mer, 2003-09-03 at 11:48, Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> > 2.4.22 has the ACPI from 2.6 backported into it, (which includes my patch
> > for nforce2 boards) so it will start having the same issue with the BIOS
> > bug in KT333/KT400  boards.
> 
> It does - 2.4.22pre7 is great on my boxes, 2.4.22 final ACPI is
> basically unusable on anything I own thats not intel. 

I can't back that. At least on all my Serverworks boxes there are no problems
with ACPI. I got reports from VIA-bases SMP boards that they are doing well, too.
(all for 2.4.22)

Regards,
Stephan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: adq_dvb@lidskialf.net, rl@hellgate.ch,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [ACPI] Where do I send APIC victims?
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:53:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030903145356.35b9a192.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1062589205.19059.6.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk>

On Wed, 03 Sep 2003 12:40:06 +0100
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> On Mer, 2003-09-03 at 11:48, Andrew de Quincey wrote:
> > 2.4.22 has the ACPI from 2.6 backported into it, (which includes my patch
> > for nforce2 boards) so it will start having the same issue with the BIOS
> > bug in KT333/KT400  boards.
> 
> It does - 2.4.22pre7 is great on my boxes, 2.4.22 final ACPI is
> basically unusable on anything I own thats not intel. 

I can't back that. At least on all my Serverworks boxes there are no problems
with ACPI. I got reports from VIA-bases SMP boards that they are doing well, too.
(all for 2.4.22)

Regards,
Stephan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-09-03 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-03  8:08 Where do I send APIC victims? Roger Luethi
2003-09-03  8:08 ` Roger Luethi
     [not found] ` <20030903080852.GA27649-NW/W/tFpkLjPJA67Yv3YjA@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-03 10:23   ` [ACPI] " Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-03 10:23     ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-03 10:23   ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-03 10:23     ` Andrew de Quincey
     [not found]     ` <200309031123.58713.adq_dvb-fmPXVN3awWJAJAzL26g0SA@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-03  9:38       ` Roger Luethi
2003-09-03  9:38         ` Roger Luethi
2003-09-03 10:30         ` Danny ter Haar
     [not found]         ` <20030903093808.GA28594-NW/W/tFpkLjPJA67Yv3YjA@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-03 10:48           ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-03 10:48             ` Andrew de Quincey
     [not found]             ` <200309031148.03941.adq_dvb-fmPXVN3awWJAJAzL26g0SA@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-03 11:40               ` Alan Cox
2003-09-03 11:40                 ` Alan Cox
     [not found]                 ` <1062589205.19059.6.camel-Z+iYsftfazAXoXS6vNje7nviChZXdy279dF7HbQ/qKg@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-03 12:53                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2003-09-03 12:53                     ` Stephan von Krawczynski
     [not found]                     ` <20030903145356.35b9a192.skraw-DcQCyzbjH0jQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-03 13:04                       ` Vladimir Lazarenko
2003-09-03 13:04                         ` Vladimir Lazarenko
     [not found]                         ` <200309031504.03596.vlad-Qw1rWqDNyQwB085IDyDbTA@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-03 14:14                           ` Stefan Smietanowski
2003-09-03 14:14                             ` Stefan Smietanowski
     [not found]                             ` <3F55F739.4010600-uPWUOVYScjfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-03 16:10                               ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-03 16:10                                 ` Andrew de Quincey
     [not found]                                 ` <200309031710.49411.adq_dvb-fmPXVN3awWJAJAzL26g0SA@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-03 18:21                                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-09-03 16:09                           ` [ACPI] " Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-03 16:09                             ` Andrew de Quincey
     [not found]                             ` <200309031709.08286.adq_dvb-fmPXVN3awWJAJAzL26g0SA@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-04  0:28                               ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-04  0:28                                 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-03 18:13                   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-09-03 18:13                     ` [ACPI] " Marcelo Tosatti
     [not found]                     ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309031511420.6102-100000-IP5UegVbiV6sTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
2003-09-03 18:15                       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-09-03 18:15                         ` [ACPI] " Marcelo Tosatti
2003-09-03 22:44                       ` Sérgio Monteiro Basto
2003-09-03 22:44                         ` Sérgio Monteiro Basto
2003-09-03 13:19       ` Greg Meyer
2003-09-03 11:05     ` [ACPI] " Matthias Andree
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-03 11:18 Nicolas Mailhot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030903145356.35b9a192.skraw@ithnet.com \
    --to=skraw-dcqcyzbjh0jqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=adq_dvb-fmPXVN3awWJAJAzL26g0SA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=alan-qBU/x9rampVanCEyBjwyrvXRex20P6io@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=rl-7uj+XXdSDtwfv37vnLkPlQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.