From: Robert Schwebel <robert@schwebel.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: Robert Schwebel <robert@schwebel.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] better i386 CPU selection
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 15:14:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030907131443.GD5460@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030907130034.GT14436@fs.tum.de>
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 03:00:34PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I didn't look at the ARM Makefile. Thanks for the note, I'll have a
> look at it before I'll do the revision of this patch.
You should definitely discuss this with rmk. How do the PPC folks handle
CPU selection?
> > Ack. Same with for example Geode. And the subarchs might have different
>
> It seems the Geode support isn't fully merged in 2.6?
That's also my impression, although I didn't have much time to look at
the state. As far as I remember Christer Weinigel has recently done some
work in this direction.
> It should be no problem to add a "Processor support" menu for the Elan
> that allows you to specify which Elan CPUs you plan to support.
Great.
Robert
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Hornemannstraße 12, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany
Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 | Fax: +49-5121-28619-4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-07 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-07 11:28 RFC: [2.6 patch] better i386 CPU selection Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 11:46 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-09-07 13:17 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 13:48 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-09-07 12:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-09-07 12:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 12:42 ` Robert Schwebel
2003-09-07 13:00 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 13:14 ` Robert Schwebel [this message]
2003-09-08 15:26 ` Tom Rini
2003-09-07 17:31 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-07 17:48 ` Robert Schwebel
2003-09-07 18:04 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-07 18:26 ` Robert Schwebel
2003-09-07 19:17 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-07 19:17 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-07 17:25 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-11 6:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-08 0:46 ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-08 14:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-09 1:11 ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-11 6:22 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-07 16:47 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-07 17:43 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-07 18:09 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-08 8:17 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-09-08 12:36 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-10 14:17 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-11 6:28 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-11 11:04 ` Dave Jones
2003-09-12 20:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-11 12:10 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-12 19:07 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-16 12:34 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-11 14:25 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-13 10:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 17:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 21:46 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-07 21:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 21:47 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-12 20:09 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-12 22:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-12 21:38 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-12 23:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-16 12:42 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-13 11:02 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-13 11:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 11:04 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-13 12:51 Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 14:20 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-09-13 17:10 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 16:11 ` Dave Jones
2003-09-13 16:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 17:21 ` Dave Jones
2003-09-13 18:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 18:35 ` Dave Jones
2003-09-13 21:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 18:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13 18:37 ` Dave Jones
2003-09-13 18:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13 20:32 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-13 22:07 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 22:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13 18:47 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <viay.6qh.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <vli4.2Ml.15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <vnjR.5Sn.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <vnD7.6jK.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <vnMX.6x0.17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <vqKS.2NP.29@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-09-14 0:07 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-14 0:10 ` David Lang
2003-09-14 8:52 John Bradford
2003-09-14 8:55 John Bradford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030907131443.GD5460@pengutronix.de \
--to=robert@schwebel.de \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.