All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	robert@schwebel.de
Subject: Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] better i386 CPU selection
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:19:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030911061924.GV27368@fs.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1062955530.16972.11.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk>

On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 06:25:30PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

> This would be a good point to fix the winchip compile options properly
> in 2.6 while you are at it. You should select -m486 (preferably
> -m486 and then turn off the padding options)

You are talking about the default for gcc versions that don't support 
-march=winchip{2,-c6} ?

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-11  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-07 11:28 RFC: [2.6 patch] better i386 CPU selection Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 11:46 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-09-07 13:17   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 13:48     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2003-09-07 12:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-09-07 12:51   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 12:42 ` Robert Schwebel
2003-09-07 13:00   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 13:14     ` Robert Schwebel
2003-09-08 15:26       ` Tom Rini
2003-09-07 17:31     ` Alan Cox
2003-09-07 17:48       ` Robert Schwebel
2003-09-07 18:04         ` Alan Cox
2003-09-07 18:26           ` Robert Schwebel
2003-09-07 19:17             ` Alan Cox
2003-09-07 19:17             ` Alan Cox
2003-09-07 17:25 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-11  6:19   ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2003-09-08  0:46 ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-08 14:29   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-09  1:11     ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-11  6:22       ` Adrian Bunk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-07 16:47 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-07 17:43 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-07 18:09   ` Alan Cox
2003-09-08  8:17     ` Rogier Wolff
2003-09-08 12:36       ` Alan Cox
2003-09-10 14:17       ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-11  6:28     ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-11 11:04       ` Dave Jones
2003-09-12 20:41         ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-11 12:10       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-12 19:07         ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-16 12:34           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-11 14:25       ` Alan Cox
2003-09-13 10:37         ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 17:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 21:46 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-07 21:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-07 21:47 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-12 20:09 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-12 22:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-12 21:38 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-12 23:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-16 12:42 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2003-09-13 11:02 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-13 11:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 11:04 Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-13 12:51 Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 14:20 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-09-13 17:10   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 16:11 ` Dave Jones
2003-09-13 16:41   ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 17:21     ` Dave Jones
2003-09-13 18:22       ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 18:35         ` Dave Jones
2003-09-13 21:52           ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 18:21   ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13 18:37     ` Dave Jones
2003-09-13 18:53       ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13 20:32         ` Alan Cox
2003-09-13 22:07         ` Adrian Bunk
2003-09-13 22:33           ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-13 18:47     ` Alan Cox
     [not found] <viay.6qh.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <vli4.2Ml.15@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <vnjR.5Sn.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <vnD7.6jK.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <vnMX.6x0.17@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <vqKS.2NP.29@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-09-14  0:07           ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-14  0:10             ` David Lang
2003-09-14  8:52 John Bradford
2003-09-14  8:55 John Bradford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030911061924.GV27368@fs.tum.de \
    --to=bunk@fs.tum.de \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robert@schwebel.de \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.