All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: willy@debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Memory mapped IO vs Port IO
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 19:25:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030911192550.7dfaf08c.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030911171205.GH29532@mail.jlokier.co.uk>

On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:12:05 +0100
Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org> wrote:

> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Even a memory write is tens to hundres of cycles.
> 
> Not from the CPU's perspective.  It is done in parallel with other
> instructions.

Only when there are more instructions to execute. But device
driver code often does a following read e.g. to check if it can submit
another request to the hardware.

My claim is basically:

Change everybody who currently does

#ifdef CONFIG_MMIO
	writel(... )
	readl(...)
#else
	outl( ... ) 
	inl ( ...) 
#endif

to 
	if (dev->mmio) { 
		writel(); 
		real();
	} else { 
		outl();
		inl();
	} 

and you will have a hard time to benchmark the difference on any non ancient system
in actual driver operation.

-Andi


  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-11 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20030911160116.GI21596@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-11 16:17 ` Memory mapped IO vs Port IO Andi Kleen
2003-09-11 16:25   ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-09-11 16:31     ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-11 16:42       ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-09-11 17:12       ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-11 17:25         ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2003-09-12  1:39           ` jw schultz
2003-09-12 16:10           ` Anthony Dominic Truong
2003-09-12 16:22             ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-12 16:27             ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-12 17:48               ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-11 17:13   ` Jamie Lokier
     [not found] ` <20030911161450.GA23536@sgi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-11 16:20   ` Andi Kleen
     [not found] <20030911192550.7dfaf08c.ak@suse.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <1063308053.4430.37.camel@huykhoi.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]   ` <20030912162713.GA4852@sgi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]     ` <20030912174807.GA629@sgi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-12 18:00       ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-12 18:04         ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-12 18:09           ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-12 18:11         ` Tim Hockin
2003-09-12 18:24           ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-12 18:29             ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-12 18:58             ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-09-12 19:51               ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-12 16:41 John Bradford
2003-09-12 21:52 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-13  4:01   ` Mike Fedyk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-11 16:01 Matthew Wilcox
2003-09-11 16:14 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-09-11 16:14 ` Jesse Barnes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030911192550.7dfaf08c.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.