From: jbarnes@sgi.com (Jesse Barnes)
To: Anthony Dominic Truong <anthony.truong@mascorp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
willy@debian.org
Subject: Re: Memory mapped IO vs Port IO
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:48:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030912174807.GA629@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030912162713.GA4852@sgi.com>
Ok, Andi asked for benchmarks, so I ran some. Let this should be a
lesson on why you shouldn't use port I/O :) I ran these on an SGI Altix
w/900 MHz McKinley processors.
Just straight calls to the routines (all of these are based on the
average of 100 iterations):
writeq(val, reg) time: 64 cycles
outl(val, reg) time: 2126 cycles
A simple branch:
if (use_mmio)
writeq(val, reg) time: 132 cycles
else
outl(val, reg) time: 1990 cycles
Using a wrapper to point to one of the routines:
wrapper->write(val, reg) time: 215 cycles
wrapper->out(val, reg) time: 3931 cycles
Thanks,
Jesse
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-12 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030911160116.GI21596@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-11 16:17 ` Memory mapped IO vs Port IO Andi Kleen
2003-09-11 16:25 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-09-11 16:31 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-11 16:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-09-11 17:12 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-11 17:25 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-12 1:39 ` jw schultz
2003-09-12 16:10 ` Anthony Dominic Truong
2003-09-12 16:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-12 16:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-12 17:48 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2003-09-11 17:13 ` Jamie Lokier
[not found] ` <20030911161450.GA23536@sgi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-11 16:20 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] <20030911192550.7dfaf08c.ak@suse.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <1063308053.4430.37.camel@huykhoi.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030912162713.GA4852@sgi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030912174807.GA629@sgi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-12 18:00 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-12 18:04 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-12 18:09 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-12 18:11 ` Tim Hockin
2003-09-12 18:24 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-12 18:29 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-12 18:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-09-12 19:51 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-12 16:41 John Bradford
2003-09-12 21:52 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-13 4:01 ` Mike Fedyk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-11 16:01 Matthew Wilcox
2003-09-11 16:14 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-09-11 16:14 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030912174807.GA629@sgi.com \
--to=jbarnes@sgi.com \
--cc=anthony.truong@mascorp.com \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.