From: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-hfsplus-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] new HFS(+) driver
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:04:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031003070422.GA8627@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310021029110.17548-100000@serv> (from zippel@linux-m68k.org on Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:37:32 +0200)
On 10.02, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a rather big update to the HFS+ driver. It includes now also an
> updated HFS driver. Both drivers use now almost the same btree code and
> the general structure is very similiar, so one day it will be possible to
> merge both drivers. The HFS driver got a major cleanup and a lot of broken
> options were removed, most notably if you want to continue using netatalk
> with this driver, you have to fix netatalk first.
>
Two notes:
- You should give a patch or at least give a notice that linux/include/hfs* have
to be killed (or move hfs_fs.h there).
- I had to include linux/sched.h in hfs/sysdep.c to get the definition for
'current', that was neded in some subinclude of linux/smp_lock. This can be
caused by any other of my patches, but it doesn't hurt.
TIA
--
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()able!es> \ Software is like sex:
werewolf!able!es \ It's better when it's free
Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.4.23-pre6-jam1 (gcc 3.3.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3.1-2mdk))
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon=cer70A47DaU@public.gmane.org>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel=Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-hfsplus-devel=5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
linux-fsdevel=u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel=u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] new HFS(+) driver
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:04:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031003070422.GA8627@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310021029110.17548-100000@serv> (from zippel@linux-m68k.org on Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:37:32 +0200)
On 10.02, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a rather big update to the HFS+ driver. It includes now also an
> updated HFS driver. Both drivers use now almost the same btree code and
> the general structure is very similiar, so one day it will be possible to
> merge both drivers. The HFS driver got a major cleanup and a lot of broken
> options were removed, most notably if you want to continue using netatalk
> with this driver, you have to fix netatalk first.
>
Two notes:
- You should give a patch or at least give a notice that linux/include/hfs* have
to be killed (or move hfs_fs.h there).
- I had to include linux/sched.h in hfs/sysdep.c to get the definition for
'current', that was neded in some subinclude of linux/smp_lock. This can be
caused by any other of my patches, but it doesn't hurt.
TIA
--
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()able!es> \ Software is like sex:
werewolf!able!es \ It's better when it's free
Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (Cooker) for i586
Linux 2.4.23-pre6-jam1 (gcc 3.3.1 (Mandrake Linux 9.2 3.3.1-2mdk))
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-03 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-02 8:37 [ANNOUNCE] new HFS(+) driver Roman Zippel
2003-10-02 18:02 ` Dave O
2003-10-02 18:30 ` Roman Zippel
2003-10-02 18:30 ` Roman Zippel
2003-10-02 19:00 ` Dave O
2003-10-02 19:00 ` Dave O
2003-10-03 0:26 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-10-03 2:43 ` Dave O
2003-10-03 2:43 ` Dave O
2003-10-02 18:06 ` viro
2003-10-02 18:24 ` Roman Zippel
2003-10-02 18:24 ` Roman Zippel
2003-10-02 18:52 ` Brad Boyer
2003-10-02 18:52 ` Brad Boyer
2003-10-06 19:38 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-10-06 19:38 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-10-06 19:47 ` Brad Boyer
2003-10-06 19:47 ` Brad Boyer
2003-10-03 7:04 ` J.A. Magallon [this message]
2003-10-03 7:04 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-10-03 10:30 ` Roman Zippel
2003-10-03 10:30 ` Roman Zippel
2003-10-03 22:39 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-10-03 22:39 ` J.A. Magallon
2003-10-04 3:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031003070422.GA8627@werewolf.able.es \
--to=jamagallon@able.es \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hfsplus-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.