From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide write barrier support
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:10:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031016071055.GI1128@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871xtfjhhh.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv>
On Tue, Oct 14 2003, Greg Stark wrote:
>
> Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Forward ported and tested today (with the dummy ext3 patch included),
> > works for me. Some todo's left, but I thought I'd send it out to gauge
> > interest. TODO:
>
>
> Is there a user-space interface planned for this?
I don't have one planned.
> One possibility may be just to hang it off fsync(2) so fsync doesn't
> return until until all the buffers it flushed are actually synced to
> disk. That's its documented semantics anyways.
Makes sense, indeed.
> There's also the case of files opened with O_SYNC. Would inserting a
> write barrier after every write to such a file destroy performance?
If it's mainly sequential io, then no it won't destroy performance. It
will be lower than without the cache flush of course.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-16 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-13 14:08 [PATCH] ide write barrier support Jens Axboe
2003-10-13 15:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-13 15:35 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-13 15:37 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-13 22:39 ` Matthias Andree
2003-10-14 0:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-16 10:36 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-16 10:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-16 10:48 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-13 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-14 6:48 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-15 3:40 ` Greg Stark
2003-10-16 7:10 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2003-10-20 17:10 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-10-20 19:56 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-20 23:46 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-10-21 5:40 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-23 16:22 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-10-23 16:23 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-23 17:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-10-23 23:21 ` Nick Piggin
2003-10-26 21:06 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-10-27 10:29 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-10-27 21:35 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-10-24 9:36 ` Helge Hafting
2003-10-26 15:38 ` Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-16 16:51 Mudama, Eric
2003-10-16 20:43 ` Greg Stark
2003-10-17 6:44 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-17 6:46 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-16 20:51 Mudama, Eric
2003-10-17 6:48 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-17 16:07 Mudama, Eric
2003-10-17 18:08 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-17 17:59 Manfred Spraul
2003-10-17 18:06 ` Jens Axboe
2003-10-21 0:47 ` Matthias Andree
2003-10-17 18:42 Mudama, Eric
[not found] <IXzh.61g.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-10-21 19:24 ` Anton Ertl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031016071055.GI1128@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=gsstark@mit.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.