From: "Thorsten Körner" <thorstenkoerner@123tkshop.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Things that Longhorn seems to be doing right
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 11:27:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310301037.14609.t.koerner@123tk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031030013418.GD3094@digitasaru.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hallo Joseph
Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2003 02:34 schrieb Joseph Pingenot:
> From Neil Brown on Thursday, 30 October, 2003:
> >On Wednesday October 29, trelane@digitasaru.net wrote:
> >> Regardless, it's an interesting idea, and one which might be
> >> fruitful. I give you then two bits: our treatment of the tech
> >> and the reality of their tech:
> >> 00: ISVAPOR | TAKESEROUSLY
> >> 01: ISVAPOR | IGNORE
> >> 10: NOTVAPOR | TAKESERIOUSLY
> >> 11: NOTVAPOR | IGNORE
> >> If we come up with a working implementation and it *is* just
> >> vaporware, then we're ahead.
> >> We're way ahead.
> >> If we merely dismiss it as vaporware and it turns out to be,
> >> no net change.
> >
> >...snip...
> >
> >> Conclusion: best to take it seriously and work on it; those
> >> two cases are the most optimal.
> >
> >Sounds like the same argument that is used in "Pascal's Wager"
> > for belief in God, and I seriously don't think the argument
> > works in either case. (note that I'm not making a statement
> > about the conclusion in either case, only about the arguement).
>
> "Sounds like?" Sure. It kind of does, now that you mention it.
>
> Regradless of the similarities and the validity of Pascal's
> argument, my argument, I think, stands. I outlined the four
> potential futures. We have control over only one bit, Microsoft
> has the other. The tech sounds nice, it is an interesting avenue
> to persue, Pascal aside.
You are absolutley right. It seems to be more than just an
interesting tech. It sounds like a really outstanding idea. And
noone should say it's a bad idea, because it's from Microsoft (tm).
They have had many good ideas (also many bad implementations of
them).
>
> I don't see any reason why we *shouldn't* look at the problem and
> try to do it. What reasons do you see for not persuing the
> problem to its inevitible implementation?
ACK
CU
Thorsten
- --
Thorsten Körner | e-Commerce-Consulting
Dannenkoppel 51 | D-22391 Hamburg
Tel.: 040/536 308 27 | Fax.: 040/536 308 26
mailto:t.koerner@123tk.com | http://www.123tk.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/oOd0s5R35vLkl/cRAp20AJ9PmBjKqnX5f8l9CaQZGGPBEa0vSQCgqEP3
O+OPB2lVef6BGSc3Ay672Ew=
=sZjd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-30 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-29 8:50 Things that Longhorn seems to be doing right Hans Reiser
2003-10-29 22:42 ` Erik Andersen
2003-10-29 23:03 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-29 22:25 ` Dax Kelson
2003-10-30 0:20 ` Joseph Pingenot
2003-10-30 0:54 ` Neil Brown
2003-10-30 1:34 ` Joseph Pingenot
2003-10-30 2:54 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2003-10-30 2:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-10-30 3:16 ` Joseph Pingenot
2003-10-30 5:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-10-30 5:56 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-30 3:16 ` Neil Brown
2003-10-30 3:39 ` Joseph Pingenot
2003-10-30 10:27 ` Thorsten Körner [this message]
2003-10-30 21:28 ` jlnance
2003-10-30 22:29 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-10-31 2:03 ` Daniel B.
2003-10-31 1:04 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2003-10-30 2:09 ` Alex Belits
2003-10-30 3:12 ` Joseph Pingenot
2003-10-30 4:21 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-10-31 16:42 ` Timothy Miller
2003-10-31 19:15 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-30 9:52 ` Ingo Oeser
2003-10-30 4:06 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-10-30 1:52 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-10-30 2:03 ` Joseph Pingenot
2003-10-30 9:23 ` Ingo Oeser
2003-10-30 3:57 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-10-30 4:08 ` Larry McVoy
2003-10-30 13:46 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-10-31 4:50 ` Stephen Satchell
2003-10-30 7:33 ` Diego Calleja García
2003-10-30 8:43 ` Giuliano Pochini
2003-10-30 8:05 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-30 8:17 ` Wichert Akkerman
2003-10-30 11:59 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-30 9:14 ` Giuliano Pochini
2003-10-30 9:55 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-30 17:48 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-10-30 19:23 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-30 20:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-10-31 7:40 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-31 19:30 ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-10-31 20:47 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-31 13:59 ` Herman
2003-10-31 21:23 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-11-01 18:30 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-31 21:08 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-02 21:42 ` Hans Reiser
2003-11-03 12:42 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-11-03 16:58 ` Timothy Miller
2003-11-04 8:13 ` Hans Reiser
2003-11-05 13:51 ` Ingo Oeser
2003-11-05 2:07 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-31 11:01 ` Kenneth Johansson
2003-10-31 13:52 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-10-30 11:21 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-10-30 7:25 ` Christian Axelsson
2003-10-30 8:10 ` Hans Reiser
[not found] ` <200311011731.10052.ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
[not found] ` <3FA3FF46.7010309@namesys.com>
2003-11-03 10:55 ` Ingo Oeser
2003-11-04 8:10 ` Hans Reiser
[not found] <LUlv.31e.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <M7iG.41B.7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <MagC.82U.7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <Maqe.8l3.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-10-30 11:10 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-10-30 17:23 ` Alex Belits
2003-10-31 1:46 ` Daniel B.
2003-10-31 1:57 ` Philippe Troin
[not found] ` <Mcig.2uf.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <Mcs2.2FJ.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-10-30 12:04 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
[not found] ` <Mg2B.7wf.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <Mh8n.BT.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <MhLf.1pF.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-10-30 12:16 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-02 13:11 Brian Beattie
2003-11-02 17:15 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-03 19:35 ` Brian Beattie
2003-11-03 20:17 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-11-03 20:23 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-03 20:54 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-11-03 21:01 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-11-03 22:06 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-11-04 8:47 ` Michael Clark
2003-11-04 12:47 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-11-04 14:02 ` Brian Beattie
2003-11-03 20:55 ` Roland Dreier
2003-11-04 0:35 ` Daniel B.
2003-11-04 14:05 ` Brian Beattie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200310301037.14609.t.koerner@123tk.com \
--to=thorstenkoerner@123tkshop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.