Re: Things that Longhorn seems to be doing right

["Ihar 'Philips' Filipau" <filia@softhome.net>]

Joseph Pingenot wrote:
> From Theodore Ts'o on Wednesday, 29 October, 2003:
> 
>>Keep in mind that just because Windows does thing a certain way
>>doesn't mean we have to provide the same functionality in exactly the
>>same way.
>>Also keep in mind that Microsoft very deliberately blurs what they do
>>in their "kernel" versus what they provide via system libraries (i.e.,
>>API's provided via their DLL's, or shared libraries).
> 
> Indeed, although certain things could be half-kernel, half-user
>   (OK, 0.01% kernel, 99.99% user, e.g. userspace daemon that
>   intercepts certain writes).  Of course, at that point, you might
>   make a special library to interact with the daemon directly, although
>   it's then not at all like just calling write().
> 

   I beleive this is 100% user space issue.

   And I think if one really want to do something like this - Gnome's 
VFS is a good candidate for this. They already have all abstractions in 
place.

   [ Yes, sure I'm not using gnome by myself - but knowing nature of the 
prokect I bet they already started doing something like this ;-))) Ashes 
to ashes, dust to dust - bloat to bloat. ]

-- 
Ihar 'Philips' Filipau  / with best regards from Saarbruecken.
--
   "... and for $64000 question, could you get yourself vaguely
      familiar with the notion of on-topic posting?"
				-- Al Viro @ LKML