* lm_sensors & kernel
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Troy Henderson
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
> Any news on whether 2.4.23 will have the sufficient code to keep from
> having to patch for i2c in order to get lm_sensors to correctly
> implement?
It probably won't, since it's a bit late to have such a big patch into
Linux 2.4.23 (so I was told). I should have been faster, my fault. I
expect only a few simple fixes to be accepted into 2.4.23, the rest of
the changes be left for 2.4.24. So I'll have to make a patch available
once more.
> Also, any news on the status of lm_sensors in 2.6 kernel?
> I didn't notice it in test9.
It is there! Take a look in drivers/i2c, you'll see almost all bus
drivers, plus several chip drivers. The main problem is that user-space
tools don't support Linux 2.6 yet (although I think someone is working
on it) so you'll have to read the raw values in /sysfs. Admittedly not
very comfortable.
--
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* lm_sensors & kernel
2005-05-19 6:24 lm_sensors & kernel Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Troy Henderson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Troy Henderson @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
> It probably won't, since it's a bit late to have such a big patch into
> Linux 2.4.23 (so I was told). I should have been faster, my fault. I
> expect only a few simple fixes to be accepted into 2.4.23, the rest of
> the changes be left for 2.4.24. So I'll have to make a patch available
> once more.
Oh well!
> It is there! Take a look in drivers/i2c, you'll see almost all bus
> drivers, plus several chip drivers. The main problem is that user-space
> tools don't support Linux 2.6 yet (although I think someone is working
> on it) so you'll have to read the raw values in /sysfs. Admittedly not
> very comfortable.
I was able to do that, but I was looking for a way to make GKRellm show
the sensor data.
##########################################################################
Troy Henderson Office: Blocker Building 619
Department of Mathematics Phone : (979) 845-7769
Texas A&M University E-mail: thenders@math.tamu.edu
College Station, TX 77845 URL : http://www.math.tamu.edu/~thenders
##########################################################################
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* lm_sensors & kernel
2005-05-19 6:24 lm_sensors & kernel Jean Delvare
@ 2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Troy Henderson
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2005-05-19 6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 02:25:11PM -0600, Troy Henderson wrote:
> > It is there! Take a look in drivers/i2c, you'll see almost all bus
> > drivers, plus several chip drivers. The main problem is that user-space
> > tools don't support Linux 2.6 yet (although I think someone is working
> > on it) so you'll have to read the raw values in /sysfs. Admittedly not
> > very comfortable.
>
> I was able to do that, but I was looking for a way to make GKRellm show
> the sensor data.
The latest versions of gkrellm should work just fine with a 2.6 kernel
to see the sensor values. It uses sysfs.
Good luck,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-19 6:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-19 6:24 lm_sensors & kernel Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Troy Henderson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.