From: wwp <subscript-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: ACPI status in 2.4 tree
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:43:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031119154324.6bbc067f.subscript@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031119142918.GF32464-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Hi Ducrot Bruno,
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 15:29:18 +0100 Ducrot Bruno <ducrot-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:52:03PM +0100, wwp wrote:
> > Hi ACPI guyz,
> >
> >
> > are 2.4's release candidates sync'ed w/ ACPI?
> > IOW, if I get 2.4.23-rc2, will it include the latest ACPI code from acpi.sf.net
> > (except the test patches) or will I have to get'n'apply a patch?
> >
>
> Why not just looking in the log? at ?
> From ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/v2.4/testing/patch-2.4.23.log
That's exactly what I did (and I use to), but I did't know if the [ACPI]
prefix implies that it's a sync' between acpi.sf.net project and Linux kernel
or a simple ACPI stuff merged to Linux. That's why I was asking :-\.
Regards,
--
wwp
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-19 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-19 12:52 ACPI status in 2.4 tree wwp
[not found] ` <20031119135203.373043b0.subscript-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-19 14:29 ` Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20031119142918.GF32464-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-19 14:43 ` wwp [this message]
2003-11-19 15:12 ` Luca Capello
[not found] ` <3FBB8840.1090306-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-19 15:46 ` wwp
[not found] ` <20031119164638.628287da.subscript-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-19 17:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
[not found] ` <20031119170515.GY30485-+pPCBgu9SkPzIGdyhVEDUDl5KyyQGfY2kSSpQ9I8OhVaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-19 18:31 ` wwp
[not found] ` <20031119193105.02361704.subscript-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-20 15:18 ` Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20031120151828.GJ32464-kk6yZipjEM5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-20 15:43 ` wwp
2003-11-19 17:24 ` Micha Feigin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-19 18:09 Brown, Len
[not found] ` <BF1FE1855350A0479097B3A0D2A80EE00147D1FD-N2PTB0HCzHJF3Yvz3xaN/VDQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
2003-11-19 19:50 ` wwp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031119154324.6bbc067f.subscript@free.fr \
--to=subscript-ganu6spqydw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.