From: Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sysfs_remove_dir Vs dcache_readdir race fix
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:17:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031120054707.GA1724@in.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi,
sysfs_remove_dir modifies d_subdirs list which results in inconsistency
when there is concurrent dcache_readdir is going on. I think there
is no need for sysfs_remove_dir to modify d_subdirs list and removal
of dentries from d_child list is taken care in the final dput().
The folloing patch fixes this race. The patch is tested by running these two
loops simlutaneously on a SMP box.
#while true; do tree /sys/class/net > /dev/null; done
#while true; do insmod ./dummy.o; rmmod dummy.o; done
o This patch fixes sysfs_remove_dir race with dcache_readdir. There is
no need for sysfs_remove_dir to modify the d_subdirs list for the directory
being deleted as it is taken care in the final dput. Modifying this list
results in inconsistent d_subdirs list and causes infinite loop in
concurrently occuring dcache_readdir.
fs/sysfs/dir.c | 4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff -puN fs/sysfs/dir.c~sysfs_remove_dir-race-fix fs/sysfs/dir.c
--- linux-2.6.0-test9-bk24/fs/sysfs/dir.c~sysfs_remove_dir-race-fix 2003-11-20 10:36:13.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.0-test9-bk24-maneesh/fs/sysfs/dir.c 2003-11-20 10:38:32.000000000 +0530
@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ void sysfs_remove_dir(struct kobject * k
node = dentry->d_subdirs.next;
while (node != &dentry->d_subdirs) {
struct dentry * d = list_entry(node,struct dentry,d_child);
- list_del_init(node);
+ node = node->next;
pr_debug(" o %s (%d): ",d->d_name.name,atomic_read(&d->d_count));
if (d->d_inode) {
d = dget_locked(d);
@@ -139,9 +139,7 @@ void sysfs_remove_dir(struct kobject * k
spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
}
pr_debug(" done\n");
- node = dentry->d_subdirs.next;
}
- list_del_init(&dentry->d_child);
spin_unlock(&dcache_lock);
up(&dentry->d_inode->i_sem);
_
--
Maneesh Soni
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India
email: maneesh@in.ibm.com
Phone: 91-80-5044999 Fax: 91-80-5268553
T/L : 9243696
next reply other threads:[~2003-11-20 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-20 5:47 Maneesh Soni [this message]
2003-11-20 5:49 ` [PATCH] sysfs_remove_dir Vs dcache_readdir race fix viro
2003-11-20 5:56 ` Maneesh Soni
2003-11-20 10:25 ` Maneesh Soni
2003-11-20 15:17 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-20 16:40 ` Dipankar Sarma
2003-11-20 18:44 ` viro
2003-11-20 18:43 ` viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031120054707.GA1724@in.ibm.com \
--to=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.