From: "Marco d'Itri" <md@Linux.IT>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
Subject: Re: irq 15: nobody cared! with KT600 chipset and 2.6.0-test9
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 12:40:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031123114055.GA1844@wonderland.linux.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311221902340.2379-100000@home.osdl.org>
On Nov 23, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
>Marco, can you try this appended (very very stupid) patch with ACPI on, so
>that we can see where irq15 gets registered? It won't fix anything, but
>I'm confused by why IRQ 15 has been registered before we probe for it..
ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
hdc: IRQ probe failed (0x3cfa: 0). Guessing at 15
hdc: CD-ROM 50X, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
hdd: 32X10, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
Badness in request_irq at arch/i386/kernel/irq.c:572
Call Trace:
[<c021a770>] ide_intr+0x0/0x130
[<c010acfc>] request_irq+0xcc/0x100
[<c021bce6>] init_irq+0x156/0x400
[<c021a770>] ide_intr+0x0/0x130
[<c021c376>] hwif_init+0xb6/0x250
[<c021b9ac>] probe_hwif_init+0x2c/0x80
[<c022769a>] ide_setup_pci_device+0x7a/0x80
[<c021906d>] via_init_one+0x3d/0x50
[<c039791d>] ide_scan_pcidev+0x5d/0x70
[<c0397976>] ide_scan_pcibus+0x46/0xd0
[<c0397823>] probe_for_hwifs+0x13/0x20
[<c0397838>] ide_init_builtin_drivers+0x8/0x20
[<c0397898>] ide_init+0x48/0x70
[<c038674b>] do_initcalls+0x2b/0xa0
[<c01278f2>] init_workqueues+0x12/0x60
[<c0105097>] init+0x27/0x110
[<c0105070>] init+0x0/0x110
[<c01072a9>] kernel_thread_helper+0x5/0xc
irq 15: nobody cared!
[...]
--
ciao, |
Marco | [3234 aln71JMBJj/2g]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-23 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-22 23:55 irq 15: nobody cared! with KT600 chipset and 2.6.0-test9 Marco d'Itri
2003-11-23 1:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-23 1:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-23 2:15 ` Marco d'Itri
2003-11-23 3:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-23 5:49 ` Len Brown
2003-11-23 11:40 ` Marco d'Itri [this message]
2003-11-23 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-23 18:52 ` Marco d'Itri
2003-11-23 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-23 19:41 ` Marco d'Itri
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-23 19:16 Brown, Len
[not found] <UPPL.70W.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <UReK.uF.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-11-23 3:39 ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-23 4:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-23 5:10 ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-23 10:29 ` Marco d'Itri
2003-11-15 10:43 Marco d'Itri
2003-11-16 11:13 ` Marco d'Itri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031123114055.GA1844@wonderland.linux.it \
--to=md@linux.it \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.