Re: [ANNOUNCE] QLogic qla2xxx driver update available (v8.00.00b6).

[Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>]

On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 02:15:06AM -0800, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> 
> Yes, in the Linux world, the NVRAM value is irrelevent -- the driver
> will determine the ideal value based on the sizeof(dma_addr_t).  I've
> already removed the NVRAM reads of the host_p[] from
> qla2x00_nvram_config().

Okay, that sounds good.  Do I take this to mean that this whole block:

        ha->flags.disable_luns = ((nv->host_p[0] & BIT_2) ? 1 : 0);
        ha->flags.disable_risc_code_load = ((nv->host_p[0] & BIT_4) ? 1 : 0);
        ha->flags.set_cache_line_size_1 = ((nv->host_p[0] & BIT_5) ? 1 : 0);
        /*
         * enable_64bit_addressing gets set in qla2x00_config_dma_addressing;
         * do not set it here.
         * ha->flags.enable_64bit_addressing = ((nv->host_p[1] & BIT_0) ? 1 : 0);
         */
        ha->flags.enable_lip_reset = ((nv->host_p[1] & BIT_1) ? 1 : 0);
        ha->flags.enable_lip_full_login = ((nv->host_p[1] & BIT_2) ? 1 : 0);
        ha->flags.enable_target_reset = ((nv->host_p[1] & BIT_3) ? 1 : 0);
        ha->flags.enable_flash_db_update = ((nv->host_p[1] & BIT_4) ? 1 : 0);

will be gone in the next update?

When do you plan to make the next update available?

thanks,

jeremy