From: Jose Luis Domingo Lopez <linux-lvm@24x7linux.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] EXT3 vs Reiserfs
Date: Mon Dec 8 09:02:02 2003 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031208150053.GA15642@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CEADF0D83077F7458B763904E47AA709287BA7@exchange.neokimia.com>
On Monday, 08 December 2003, at 09:39:38 -0500,
Yanick Quirion wrote:
> Could you please tell what is the best filesystem for linux between ext3 and reiserfs?
>
It is hardly to find something that is "best" by everyone standards of
"best". Maybe ext3 is better suited for your particular setup, or maybe
is reiserfs what fits best to your configuration. Just now the features
of each filesystem, do some "real-world" usage or test on both, and
decide for yourself.
> I know that ext3 can handle ACLs and not online fs extend, and reiserfs do not seems to support ACLs (I found some patches for kernel 2.4.21, but there are errors when I apply them to the kernel sources), but can be extend while it's online.
>
You will have to take into account those existing and missing features
of both filesystems and see if you absolutely need one of them that is
not available in one of the two. Maybe it would be nice to have support
for quotas and ACL on reiserfs, but if you don't need these features,
why bother ?. Stick with what is best for _your_ needs.
Greetings.
--
Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
Linux Registered User #189436 Debian Linux Sid (Linux 2.6.0-test10-mm1)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-08 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-08 8:41 [linux-lvm] EXT3 vs Reiserfs Yanick Quirion
2003-12-08 9:02 ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez [this message]
2003-12-08 9:09 ` Markus Schiltknecht
2003-12-08 9:32 ` Matt
2003-12-08 9:50 ` Markus Schiltknecht
2003-12-08 9:59 ` Matt
2003-12-08 10:14 ` Markus Schiltknecht
2003-12-08 10:16 ` Spam
2003-12-08 10:19 ` Chris Cox
2003-12-08 10:25 ` Spam
2003-12-08 10:36 ` Markus Baertschi
2003-12-08 11:20 ` Chris Cox
2003-12-09 11:53 ` Remco Post
2003-12-09 12:30 ` Chris Cox
2003-12-08 10:30 ` Markus Baertschi
2003-12-10 7:58 ` Andreas Dilger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-08 9:16 Little, Chris
2003-12-08 9:44 ` Markus Schiltknecht
2003-12-08 13:56 ` Ajay Shekhawat
2003-12-08 14:06 ` Spam
2003-12-08 14:09 ` Mike Williams
2003-12-08 9:51 Little, Chris
2003-12-08 15:22 Yanick Quirion
2003-12-08 22:52 ` Ajay Shekhawat
2003-12-09 14:36 Little, Chris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031208150053.GA15642@localhost \
--to=linux-lvm@24x7linux.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.