From: Matt <mschilli@vss.fsi.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] EXT3 vs Reiserfs
Date: Mon Dec 8 09:32:02 2003 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1070897481.9011.38.camel@hotbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CEADF0D83077F7458B763904E47AA709287BA7@exchange.neokimia.com>
Reiserfs has in some cases better performance. But resiserfs (in 2.4)
has NO bad block management capabilities..
So, if your drive gets bad blocks, you can very quickly be rebuilding
your entire filesystem ( I lost a TB on a RAID where one drive developed
some bad blocks.)
Just keep in mind stability.
Matt Schillinger
mschilli@vss.fsi.com
On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 08:39, Yanick Quirion wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Could you please tell what is the best filesystem for linux between ext3 and reiserfs?
>
> I know that ext3 can handle ACLs and not online fs extend, and reiserfs do not seems to support ACLs (I found some patches for kernel 2.4.21, but there are errors when I apply them to the kernel sources), but can be extend while it's online.
>
> I'm just asking for your personal opinion and knowledge with them.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> -----------
> Yanick Quirion
> Administrateur Réseau/Network Manager
> NEOKIMIA INC.
> Institut de Pharmacologie de Sherbrooke
> 3e étage (Édifice Z5)
> 3001 12e avenue Nord
> Sherbrooke, Québec
> CANADA
> J1H 5N4
>
> Tél.: +1 819 820-6040
> Direct: +1 819 820-6855
> Fax.: +1 819 820-6841
>
> email: Yanick.Quirion@neokimia.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@sistina.com
> http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-08 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-08 8:41 [linux-lvm] EXT3 vs Reiserfs Yanick Quirion
2003-12-08 9:02 ` Jose Luis Domingo Lopez
2003-12-08 9:09 ` Markus Schiltknecht
2003-12-08 9:32 ` Matt [this message]
2003-12-08 9:50 ` Markus Schiltknecht
2003-12-08 9:59 ` Matt
2003-12-08 10:14 ` Markus Schiltknecht
2003-12-08 10:16 ` Spam
2003-12-08 10:19 ` Chris Cox
2003-12-08 10:25 ` Spam
2003-12-08 10:36 ` Markus Baertschi
2003-12-08 11:20 ` Chris Cox
2003-12-09 11:53 ` Remco Post
2003-12-09 12:30 ` Chris Cox
2003-12-08 10:30 ` Markus Baertschi
2003-12-10 7:58 ` Andreas Dilger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-08 9:16 Little, Chris
2003-12-08 9:44 ` Markus Schiltknecht
2003-12-08 13:56 ` Ajay Shekhawat
2003-12-08 14:06 ` Spam
2003-12-08 14:09 ` Mike Williams
2003-12-08 9:51 Little, Chris
2003-12-08 15:22 Yanick Quirion
2003-12-08 22:52 ` Ajay Shekhawat
2003-12-09 14:36 Little, Chris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1070897481.9011.38.camel@hotbox \
--to=mschilli@vss.fsi.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.