All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Rompf <srompf@isg.de>
To: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@watson.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Deadlock in sungem/ip_auto_config/linkwatch
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 17:50:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200401051750.56233.srompf@isg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1073319565.2043.98923.camel@brick.watson.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 986 bytes --]

Am Montag, 05. Januar 2004 17:19 schrieb Michal Ostrowski:

> Suppose the linkwatch code backs-off in the case that rtnl_sem is held
> legitimately by thread A.  Meanwhile, thread B is doing a
> flush_scheduled_work in order to wait for pending linkwatch events to
> complete.

This won't happen. If a pending linkwatch event needs to be scheduled 
synchronously (f.e. when a device is unregistered), it is executed in context 
of the calling process, not inside the workqueue thread.

> My initial though was to use a seperate work-queue, un-entangled with
> the global queue used for flush_scheduled_work. This would allow
> linkwatch events to be synchronized against explicitly.

That's overkill, and if I understand flush_workqueue() right, it doesn't care 
about work that is queued with delay, so it even wouldn't help. That's why I 
thought about a function to unregister pending work.

Stefan
-- 
"doesn't work" is not a magic word to explain everything.

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 1691 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2004-01-05 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-01-05 13:07 Deadlock in sungem/ip_auto_config/linkwatch Michal Ostrowski
2004-01-05 14:50 ` Stefan Rompf
2004-01-05 16:19   ` Michal Ostrowski
2004-01-05 16:50     ` Stefan Rompf [this message]
2004-01-05 19:02   ` David S. Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200401051750.56233.srompf@isg.de \
    --to=srompf@isg.de \
    --cc=mostrows@watson.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.