* OT: Serial ATA
@ 2003-12-24 7:40 Paulo Andre
2003-12-24 18:29 ` Joel Newkirk
2004-01-07 20:34 ` enigma
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paulo Andre @ 2003-12-24 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
I have to build a new firewall and the salesman is trying to sell me Serial
ATA as part of the solution.
Has anyone used this, because I have heard that Serial ATA is not up to spec?
Paulo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: OT: Serial ATA
2003-12-24 7:40 OT: Serial ATA Paulo Andre
@ 2003-12-24 18:29 ` Joel Newkirk
2004-01-07 20:34 ` enigma
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Newkirk @ 2003-12-24 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paulo Andre; +Cc: netfilter
On Wed, 2003-12-24 at 02:40, Paulo Andre wrote:
> I have to build a new firewall and the salesman is trying to sell me Serial
> ATA as part of the solution.
> Has anyone used this, because I have heard that Serial ATA is not up to spec?
>
> Paulo
I have an Asus mobo with VIA chipset that includes SATA. I'm delighted
with the performance.
HOWEVER...
Until a distro is released that has SATA drivers on the install media it
is exceptionally difficult to actually install Linux to the SATA drive.
I ended up needing to install to my old IDE drive, build a 2.6.0 kernel,
mount the SATA drive and prep it, transfer all partitions from the old
drive to the SATA, then install Grub on the SATA drive.
The short of it: make DAMN sure that if you go the SATA-only route that
the SATA chipset is supported by 2.4.2x kernels that are used by
installers, or be prepared for a long tortuous process getting it up and
running.
SATA is great, IMHO, but support for it under Linux is not sufficient
for worry-free installs, YET... With the final release of kernel 2.6.0
last week, I expect that to change in the near future for many
distributions. (although not RedHat, of course :( and Fedora is on a
scheduled release cycle, so I don't anticipate it there for a few months
either)
j
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: OT: Serial ATA
2003-12-24 7:40 OT: Serial ATA Paulo Andre
2003-12-24 18:29 ` Joel Newkirk
@ 2004-01-07 20:34 ` enigma
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: enigma @ 2004-01-07 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paulo Andre; +Cc: netfilter
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 09:40:41AM +0200, Paulo Andre wrote:
> I have to build a new firewall and the salesman is trying to sell me Serial
> ATA as part of the solution.
> Has anyone used this, because I have heard that Serial ATA is not up to spec?
Not sure SATA has anything to do with a firewall box. Unless you are
doing a lot of logging, you don't need enhanced performance on the IDE
bus, do you?
If you were building a file/application server, SATA on something like
the 3Ware cards is nice, but still a bit overrated ATM.
Cheers,
Ed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-07 20:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-24 7:40 OT: Serial ATA Paulo Andre
2003-12-24 18:29 ` Joel Newkirk
2004-01-07 20:34 ` enigma
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.