From: khali@linux-fr.org (Jean Delvare)
To: Nicolas Nilles <nnilles@skycop.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com,
sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com
Subject: Kernel 2.6.0 and i2c-viapro posible Bug
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040107223046.093ea670.khali@linux-fr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OLEKJGKIEPMKIGIPLDBNCEKJCDAA.nnilles@skycop.net>
> I thinks that thgere is probably a bug in I2c-viapro module,
> cuz when i load i2c-viapro after loading w82781d, my computer just
> put very slow..., i try loading as modules in the kernel or built in,
> in both cases i have the same problem.
>
> I use 2.6.0 Vanilla Kernel sources.
> Please i will really apreciate if some one responde to this
> mail, put my adress in the CC field please cuz i not in the LKML.
> If someone need another information about my computer, config..
> or somehting more, just ask for it.
>
> Thanks.
Tested this on my own system with similar hardware (as far as i2c is
concerned) under 2.6.1-rc2. I did not experience any slowdown.
Could you please provide the following information:
* Output of "lspci -n".
* Can you reproduce the problem with a 2.4.24 kernel and i2c+lm_sensors
2.8.2?
* Can you reproduce the problem with a 2.6.1-rc2 kernel?
* Can you reproduce the problem without ACPI support enabled into your
kernel?
* Does the slowdown affect only the hard-disk drive?
* Does the speed come back to normal if you remove i2c-viapro?
* Does the slowdown occur if you load i2c-viapro before w83781d?
Yeah, I know, this is much work, but we need a hint to start digging.
Thanks.
--
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Nicolas Nilles" <nnilles@skycop.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com,
sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.0 and i2c-viapro posible Bug
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 22:30:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040107223046.093ea670.khali@linux-fr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OLEKJGKIEPMKIGIPLDBNCEKJCDAA.nnilles@skycop.net>
> I thinks that thgere is probably a bug in I2c-viapro module,
> cuz when i load i2c-viapro after loading w82781d, my computer just
> put very slow..., i try loading as modules in the kernel or built in,
> in both cases i have the same problem.
>
> I use 2.6.0 Vanilla Kernel sources.
> Please i will really apreciate if some one responde to this
> mail, put my adress in the CC field please cuz i not in the LKML.
> If someone need another information about my computer, config..
> or somehting more, just ask for it.
>
> Thanks.
Tested this on my own system with similar hardware (as far as i2c is
concerned) under 2.6.1-rc2. I did not experience any slowdown.
Could you please provide the following information:
* Output of "lspci -n".
* Can you reproduce the problem with a 2.4.24 kernel and i2c+lm_sensors
2.8.2?
* Can you reproduce the problem with a 2.6.1-rc2 kernel?
* Can you reproduce the problem without ACPI support enabled into your
kernel?
* Does the slowdown affect only the hard-disk drive?
* Does the speed come back to normal if you remove i2c-viapro?
* Does the slowdown occur if you load i2c-viapro before w83781d?
Yeah, I know, this is much work, but we need a hint to start digging.
Thanks.
--
Jean Delvare
http://www.ensicaen.ismra.fr/~delvare/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-19 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-07 19:55 Kernel 2.6.0 and i2c-viapro posible Bug Nicolas Nilles
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Nicolas Nilles
2004-01-07 21:30 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2004-01-08 15:11 ` Nicolas Nilles
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Nicolas Nilles
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-09 18:55 Ivanovich
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Ivanovich
2004-01-10 11:41 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2004-01-10 14:40 ` Ivanovich
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Ivanovich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040107223046.093ea670.khali@linux-fr.org \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nnilles@skycop.net \
--cc=sensors@stimpy.netroedge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.