From: Daniel Brahneborg <basic@wtnord.net>
To: "Måns Rullgård" <mru@kth.se>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID5 over Serial-ATA success stories?
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 08:57:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040108085711.A2500@nettis.grimsta> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yw1xn08z8ltb.fsf@ford.guide>; from mru@kth.se on Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 10:56:32PM +0100
Thanks for the feedback, it's very valuable to me.
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 10:56:32PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote:
> Daniel Brahneborg <daniel.com@wtnord.net> writes:
>
> > I'd like to hear some success stories for RAID5 on Serial-ATA disks.
> > Which Serial-ATA card are you using? Do you get decent performance?
> > Is it stable with DMA enabled? Do you use the 2.4 or 2.6 kernel?
> >
> > I know this much:
> >
> > It doesn't work with Silicon Image.
>
> What doesn't work? There are drivers, at least in 2.6. Raid should
> care about what sort of disks you use.
When using it for normal disks e2fsck reports bad blocks all
over the disk. When used for RAID, I get corrupted data. Not
much, maybe every second time for a file of 500MB.
This is with the IDE driver. With the SCSI driver, my computer
completely freezes when I activate my second network card (as I
reported earlier, unfortunately still without a solution).
RAID might work with that driver, but unless the network card
problem is solved, that doesn't help me.
> > It doesn't work with VIA (yet, anyway).
> > It might work with HighPoint.
>
> I've run RAID5 on a Highpoint RocketRAID 1540. I used ATA disks with
> SATA converters, though. Works with both 2.4 and 2.6.
Sounds good to hear. It's the second cheapest card for me.
> > It probably works with Promise.
> > I don't know if there's a driver for Adaptec.
>
> Which Adaptec card? The 12xx cards are fakeraid, but are supported as
> normal cards. The 24xx cards are true hardware RAID cards. Linux
> drivers exist for these, too.
It's the 12xx cards that I'm looking at. I don't want hardware
RAID, since hardware RAID5 costs an infinite amount of money.
> > In case I have to replace my Silicon Image card, what should I replace
> > it with? I'm currently leaning towards Promise TX4 (or TX2 if the VIA
> > driver is completed).
>
> I stay as far away as I can from Promise and VIA. Anything is usually
> better than those two.
Why the warning about Promise? The reason I want the VIA
driver to work is that I've got two VIA connectors on the
motherboard, so I only need a 2 port SATA card.
/Basic
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-08 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-07 21:36 RAID5 over Serial-ATA success stories? Daniel Brahneborg
2004-01-07 21:56 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-01-08 7:57 ` Daniel Brahneborg [this message]
2004-01-08 8:06 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-01-08 8:27 ` Daniel Brahneborg
2004-01-08 11:48 ` A.J.Dawson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040108085711.A2500@nettis.grimsta \
--to=basic@wtnord.net \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mru@kth.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.