* [linux-lvm] Problems with ext3 on LVM
@ 2004-01-09 9:53 Cody Bailey
2004-01-09 14:30 ` Nils Juergens
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Cody Bailey @ 2004-01-09 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1354 bytes --]
I was dinking around with my previous problem with the "Group 3125's block bitmap" problem (posted earlier this evening, and I found some interesting problems.
I CAN in fact mount my /dev/storage/lvol0 and access files, BUT, when I run cfdisk on my drives I get wierd errors, let me explain:
Promise ATA100 TX card (2 channel)
4 Drives Hooked UP
hde, hdf, hdh, hdg
I have my lvol0 setup like this:
First I added hde1 (partition type Linux LVM) to a new PV. Went through the steps and what not. Then added hdf1 (same deal), all is well.
hdh has data on it that i'm not going to use in this LVM, so I skipped it and added hdg1 to the Volume. All the while using the 2.0 utils, on a 2.4 kernel. I did get the partitions setup right on lvol0, and df -h reports everything fine.
When I run cfdisk on hde (the first drive) it tells me there's no partition table. WTF?
Next i ran it on hdf, same thing.
THEN, i ran it on hdh, and it finds a partition with Linux LVM partition type.
What gives? Shouldn't all drives show up with partition types of LinuxLVM if they are in a LVM setup? Why did they change?
(Sorry this is kinda confusing, i'm not in my best writing state...18 hours awake and still got lots of oragnizing to do)
Cody
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1931 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] Problems with ext3 on LVM
2004-01-09 9:53 [linux-lvm] Problems with ext3 on LVM Cody Bailey
@ 2004-01-09 14:30 ` Nils Juergens
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nils Juergens @ 2004-01-09 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On Fri, 09.01.04, Cody Bailey <codyb81@yahoo.com> wrote:
> What gives? Shouldn't all drives show up with partition types of LinuxLVM if they are in a LVM setup? Why did they change?
>
> (Sorry this is kinda confusing, i'm not in my best writing state...18 hours awake and still got lots of oragnizing to do)
If your partition tables are gone, it may be possible (esp. when sleepy)
that you mistakenly used pvcreate on the device (e.g. /dev/hde) instead of
on the partition (/dev/hde1). Happend to me, once :)
Nils
--
Nils Juergens | nils@muon.de | icq 7090774
Having problems sending big files over the net?
Try out Efisto (http://efisto.rnbhq.org).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-09 14:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-09 9:53 [linux-lvm] Problems with ext3 on LVM Cody Bailey
2004-01-09 14:30 ` Nils Juergens
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.