* [uml-devel] [inkblot@movealong.org: Bug#224215: incorrect /proc timestamp]
@ 2004-01-12 6:46 Matt Zimmerman
2004-02-14 0:43 ` Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Matt Zimmerman @ 2004-01-12 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: user-mode-linux-devel; +Cc: 224215-forwarded
----- Forwarded message from Nate Riffe <inkblot@movealong.org> -----
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 19:17:10 -0600
From: Nate Riffe <inkblot@movealong.org>
Resent-From: Nate Riffe <inkblot@movealong.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#224215: incorrect /proc timestamp
Package: user-mode-linux
The timestamp of /proc after mounting the proc filesystem is fixed at
Jan 1, 1970 (likely initialized to 0 in Unix time and then never set).
This causes problems for some distributions running as UML systems
using the user-mode-linux kernel, including Debian, which relies on the
timestamp of /proc to clear out the contents of /var/run and
/var/lock. Comments in the "bootmisc.sh" initscript indicate that the
/proc timestamp is normally the time at which /proc is mounted.
I have also seen this issue with every other UML kernel to which I
have access, and so I believe it is probably an upstream bug.
--
--< ((\))< >----< inkblot@movealong.org >----< http://www.movealong.org/ >--
pub 1024D/05A058E0 2002-03-07 Nate Riffe (06-Mar-2002) <inkblot@movealong.org>
Key fingerprint = 0DAC F5CB D182 3165 D757 C466 CD42 12A8 05A0 58E0
----- End forwarded message -----
--
- mdz
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [uml-devel] [inkblot@movealong.org: Bug#224215: incorrect /proc timestamp]
2004-01-12 6:46 [uml-devel] [inkblot@movealong.org: Bug#224215: incorrect /proc timestamp] Matt Zimmerman
@ 2004-02-14 0:43 ` Jeff Dike
2004-02-14 1:52 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.3-rc2-1, RTC, CPU > 2.1 Ghz Christopher S. Aker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2004-02-14 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matt Zimmerman; +Cc: user-mode-linux-devel, 224215-forwarded
mdz@debian.org said:
> The timestamp of /proc after mounting the proc filesystem is fixed at
> Jan 1, 1970 (likely initialized to 0 in Unix time and then never set).
This will be fixed in the next patch. The problem was that no timer interrupts
had fired by the time /proc was first mounted, so xtime, which is used to
initialize the /proc inode times, was still 0.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.3-rc2-1, RTC, CPU > 2.1 Ghz
2004-02-14 0:43 ` Jeff Dike
@ 2004-02-14 1:52 ` Christopher S. Aker
2004-02-14 4:00 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christopher S. Aker @ 2004-02-14 1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Dike; +Cc: user-mode-linux-devel
Jeff,
Looking at uml-patch-2.6.3-rc2-1, I noticed it needs the RTC fix (mhz to unsigned
long long) for CPUs > 2.1Ghz This is just a friendly reminder to make sure that
change makes it into your 2.6 tree (looks good on 2.4)..
Thanks,
-Chris
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.3-rc2-1, RTC, CPU > 2.1 Ghz
2004-02-14 1:52 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.3-rc2-1, RTC, CPU > 2.1 Ghz Christopher S. Aker
@ 2004-02-14 4:00 ` Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2004-02-14 4:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher S. Aker; +Cc: user-mode-linux-devel
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 07:52:20PM -0600, Christopher S. Aker wrote:
> Looking at uml-patch-2.6.3-rc2-1, I noticed it needs the RTC fix (mhz to unsigned
> long long) for CPUs > 2.1Ghz This is just a friendly reminder to make sure that
> change makes it into your 2.6 tree (looks good on 2.4)..
Right. Generic fixes (2.4 and 2.6) usually start off in my 2.4 tree, then
get migrated into my 2.6 tree when I get around to it.
Jeff
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-02-14 3:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-12 6:46 [uml-devel] [inkblot@movealong.org: Bug#224215: incorrect /proc timestamp] Matt Zimmerman
2004-02-14 0:43 ` Jeff Dike
2004-02-14 1:52 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.3-rc2-1, RTC, CPU > 2.1 Ghz Christopher S. Aker
2004-02-14 4:00 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.