From: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>
To: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: M A Young <m.a.young@durham.ac.uk>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:56:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040116215613.GA2849@bytesex.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200401161727.i0GHRKVW002726@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 12:27:20PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> m.a.young@durham.ac.uk said:
> > Actually, I am no longer convinced the lack of these syscalls cause
> > the problem directly; I think there is something else in recent glibcs
> > that cause the kernel to hang, at least in tt mode, though it is
> > probably related.
>
> Maybe, but it's a definite problem. However, the segfaults people were seeing
> with 2.6.1 may be gone since that was a separate problem which is fixed in
> the 2.6.1 patch.
The segfaults are gone for me, 2.6.1 with the new uml patch boots just fine.
Gerd
PS: I've just pushed fresh-built kernel rpms, they should find their way
to ftp.suse.com + mirrors (/pub/people/kraxel) next hours.
--
"... und auch das ganze Wochenende oll" -- Wetterbericht auf RadioEins
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-16 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-13 5:05 [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 5:05 ` uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 5:18 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 5:18 ` uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 10:19 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Sven Köhler
2004-01-13 10:19 ` uml-patch-2.6.0 Sven Köhler
2004-01-13 18:55 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Gerd Knorr
2004-01-16 2:33 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 10:03 ` M A Young
2004-01-16 11:42 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-01-17 16:10 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-16 17:27 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 21:56 ` Gerd Knorr [this message]
2004-01-17 21:12 ` M A Young
2004-01-18 4:47 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 23:47 ` Sven Köhler
2004-01-17 19:09 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-17 19:50 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-17 20:03 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-18 4:51 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 16:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 21:06 ` [uml-devel] uml 2.6.1 kbuild simplifications Ingo Molnar
2004-01-19 0:08 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2004-01-19 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 17:40 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 23:57 ` [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-19 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-19 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 0:19 ` M A Young
2004-01-20 0:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 0:41 ` M A Young
2004-01-23 21:52 ` [uml-devel] tt mode tls/glibc crash with 2.6 (Was: Re: uml-patch-2.6.0) M A Young
2004-01-23 23:52 ` [uml-devel] " M A Young
2004-01-24 12:25 ` M A Young
2004-01-24 18:20 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-24 19:31 ` M A Young
2004-01-28 11:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 12:45 ` M A Young
2004-02-05 13:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 13:28 ` M A Young
2004-02-05 18:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:15 ` M A Young
2004-02-05 19:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-06 7:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 1:27 ` [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-20 17:22 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-20 19:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-17 19:09 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 BlaisorBlade
2004-01-17 19:51 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 13:58 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.1-1: VFS: Cannot open root device "ubd0" or unknown-block(0, 0) Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 14:04 ` [uml-devel] " Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 23:48 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-17 20:32 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 M A Young
2004-01-19 17:06 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Gerd Knorr
2004-01-20 19:42 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-20 21:30 ` Gerd Knorr
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-18 18:46 M A Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040116215613.GA2849@bytesex.org \
--to=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=m.a.young@durham.ac.uk \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.