From: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0
Date: 13 Jan 2004 19:55:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y8sbbrup.fsf@bytesex.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bu0gnf$ief$1@sea.gmane.org>
Sven Köhler <skoehler@upb.de> writes:
> > The 2.6.0 UML patch is available at
> > http://www.user-mode-linux.org/mirror/uml-patch-2.6.0-1.bz2
>
> gcc -Wl,-T,arch/um/uml.lds.s -static -Wl,--wrap,malloc -Wl,--wrap,free
> -Wl,--wra
> p,calloc \
> -o linux arch/um/main.o vmlinux -L/usr/lib -lutil
> vmlinux(.text+0x5288): In function `mem_init':
> : undefined reference to `phys_page'
> vmlinux(.init.text+0x21f3): In function `kmap_init':
> : undefined reference to `pte_offset'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Disable CONFIG_HIGHMEM, then it does build.
I have a few more questions:
* what is the status of kernel modules in 2.6 kernels? It doesn't
build without patching the kernel: One issue is some elf relocation
defines being missing (R_386_32, R_386_PC32), making
apply_relocate() fail to build. The other issue is
apply_alternatives() not being defined, making the final link fail.
Trying to fix that, booting and trying to load modules leads to
kernel panic.
* Any known issues with 2.6.1 kernels? Tried to apply the 2.6.0
patch to 2.6.1 and fixup the one reject in arch/um/kernel/irq.c
manually and the fs/proc/task_mmu.c build failure with a patch
fished from this list. But the resulting kernel fails to boot up
the system. I see the init start banner, then it stops. Looking
whats up with gdb shows that the fork syscall seems to hang in a
endless loop, pagefaulting at the same address over and over ...
Gerd
--
You have a new virus in /var/mail/kraxel
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-13 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-13 5:05 [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 5:05 ` uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 5:18 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 5:18 ` uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-13 10:19 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Sven Köhler
2004-01-13 10:19 ` uml-patch-2.6.0 Sven Köhler
2004-01-13 18:55 ` Gerd Knorr [this message]
2004-01-16 2:33 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 10:03 ` M A Young
2004-01-16 11:42 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-01-17 16:10 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-16 17:27 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 21:56 ` Gerd Knorr
2004-01-17 21:12 ` M A Young
2004-01-18 4:47 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-16 23:47 ` Sven Köhler
2004-01-17 19:09 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-17 19:50 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-17 20:03 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-18 4:51 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 16:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 21:06 ` [uml-devel] uml 2.6.1 kbuild simplifications Ingo Molnar
2004-01-19 0:08 ` [uml-devel] " Jeff Dike
2004-01-19 7:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 17:40 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 23:57 ` [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-19 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-19 8:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 0:19 ` M A Young
2004-01-20 0:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 0:41 ` M A Young
2004-01-23 21:52 ` [uml-devel] tt mode tls/glibc crash with 2.6 (Was: Re: uml-patch-2.6.0) M A Young
2004-01-23 23:52 ` [uml-devel] " M A Young
2004-01-24 12:25 ` M A Young
2004-01-24 18:20 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-24 19:31 ` M A Young
2004-01-28 11:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 12:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 12:45 ` M A Young
2004-02-05 13:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 13:28 ` M A Young
2004-02-05 18:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:15 ` M A Young
2004-02-05 19:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-05 19:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-02-06 7:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-20 1:27 ` [uml-devel] Re: uml-patch-2.6.0 Jeff Dike
2004-01-20 17:22 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-20 19:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-17 19:09 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 BlaisorBlade
2004-01-17 19:51 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-18 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 13:58 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.1-1: VFS: Cannot open root device "ubd0" or unknown-block(0, 0) Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 14:04 ` [uml-devel] " Ingo Molnar
2004-01-18 23:48 ` Jeff Dike
2004-01-17 20:32 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 M A Young
2004-01-19 17:06 ` [uml-devel] uml-patch-2.6.0 Gerd Knorr
2004-01-20 19:42 ` BlaisorBlade
2004-01-20 21:30 ` Gerd Knorr
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-18 18:46 M A Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y8sbbrup.fsf@bytesex.org \
--to=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.