From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Limit hash table size
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 14:25:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040118142514.GG6293@krispykreme> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB580245C@scsmsx401.sc.intel.com>
Hi,
> To address Anton's concerns on PPC64, we have revised the patch to
> enforce maximum size base on number of entry instead of page order. So
> differences in page size/pointer size etc doesn't affect the final
> calculation. The upper bound is capped at 2M. All numbers on x86
> remain the same as we don't want to disturb already established and
> working number. See patch at the end of the email. It is diff'ed
> relative to 2.6.1-mm3 tree.
That sounds reasonable to me.
Anton
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Limit hash table size
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 01:25:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040118142514.GG6293@krispykreme> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB580245C@scsmsx401.sc.intel.com>
Hi,
> To address Anton's concerns on PPC64, we have revised the patch to
> enforce maximum size base on number of entry instead of page order. So
> differences in page size/pointer size etc doesn't affect the final
> calculation. The upper bound is capped at 2M. All numbers on x86
> remain the same as we don't want to disturb already established and
> working number. See patch at the end of the email. It is diff'ed
> relative to 2.6.1-mm3 tree.
That sounds reasonable to me.
Anton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-18 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-08 23:12 Limit hash table size Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-08 23:12 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-09 9:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-09 9:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-01-09 14:25 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-09 14:25 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-09 19:05 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-09 19:05 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-12 13:32 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-12 13:32 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-14 22:29 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-14 22:29 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-14 22:31 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-14 22:31 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-01-18 14:25 ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2004-01-18 14:25 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-02-05 23:58 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-05 23:58 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06 0:10 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-02-06 0:10 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-02-06 0:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06 0:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-09 23:12 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-02-09 23:12 ` Jes Sorensen
2004-02-17 22:24 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-02-17 22:24 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-02-17 23:24 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-17 23:24 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-18 0:16 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-02-18 0:16 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-02-18 0:45 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2004-02-18 0:45 ` Chen, Kenneth W
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-12 16:50 Manfred Spraul
[not found] <B05667366EE6204181EABE9C1B1C0EB5802441@scsmsx401.sc.intel.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20040205155813.726041bd.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-02-06 1:54 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-05 2:38 ` Steve Lord
2004-02-06 3:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-05 4:06 ` Steve Lord
2004-02-06 4:39 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-06 4:59 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06 5:34 ` Maneesh Soni
2004-02-06 3:19 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-06 3:23 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-06 3:34 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06 3:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-18 12:41 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-06 3:09 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06 3:18 ` Andi Kleen
2004-02-06 3:30 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06 4:45 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-06 6:22 ` Matt Mackall
2004-02-06 20:20 ` Taneli Vähäkangas
2004-02-06 20:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-06 21:46 ` Taneli Vähäkangas
2004-02-06 6:32 Manfred Spraul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040118142514.GG6293@krispykreme \
--to=anton@samba.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.