[U-Boot-Users] u-boot.h/bd_t missing fields needed by Linux IBM IIC I2C Interface Driver

[Brian Waite <waite@skycomputers.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tolunay,
	May I suggest that after you are done testing the kernel changes that you 
post a patch for inclusion to the linuxppc-2.4 tree onto the ppc dev mailing 
list. I agree the number of PPC trees, and their, relevance on a given day is 
hard to follow, but hopefully the linuxppc-2.4 tree can stay for a while. The 
only way to get changes into this tree though is for someone to test and 
incorporate them. It is tough, I know. I am still trying to get things into 
the 2.4 kernel, but that is the way of the kernel. If no one puts a little 
sweat to get it included, then it will never get included. Just my 2 cents
Thanks
Brian
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 09:12 pm, listmember at orkun.us wrote:
> > In message <13382.24.206.119.24.1075829319.squirrel@www.orkun.us> you
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > No, the  fields  are  useful  and  needed.  We  added  these  to  our
> >> > "linuxppc_2_4_devel" tree some time ago:
> >>
> >> linuxppc_2_4_devel did not have csb272 support. According to Dan Kegel
> >> who
> >> did the porting linuxppc_2_4_devel tree is dead and and not maintained
> >> and
> >> changes should go to linuxppc-2.4 instead. Also the above URL indicates
> >> linux_2_4_devel is old.
> >
> > Well, feel free to ignore it, then. All I was trying to do is showing
> > you where you can find a  (tested  and  working)  solution  for  your
> > problem. Feel free to use the "new" and "living" linuxppc-2.4 source tree
> > which does not contain the fixes you need.
>
> No, I was not implying anything or trying to be rude. I just reported what
> I was told and initially though I should use linuxppc_2_4_devel from
> linuxppc trees. It is a pity that all this stuff is scattered all around
> each having bits and pieces I need but none is complete (to build CSB272
> kernel) :(
>
> >> Where can I get these changes? Is this your copy of linuxppc_2_4_devel
> >> or
> >> (so-called) official tree?
> >
> > As I wrote before: this is in the "linuxppc_2_4_devel" module on  our
> > CVS server.
>
> Sorry, it was not clear to me. Anyway, I copied ppcboot.h and
> i2c-ibm_iic.c (due to different field name - one line change) from your
> tree to the linuxppc tree and it worked. However, the new fields were not
> intialized properly so driver somehow defaulted to sane values :) I am
> using u-boot 1.0 . I guess I need to checkout u-boot from CVS and apply my
> csb272 board changes to have them initialized properly. right?
>
> Best regards,
> Tolunay
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAINw0mxLCz0u+Ko8RAiHGAJ4qaDYryRe3KwKQhPAlfiHsjjRwNgCfQ8TO
Q+tmx2/lPU82LKYWpWXIibU=
=/8y1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----