All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: Tomas Zvala <tomas@zvala.cz>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0, cdrom still showing directories after being erased
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 22:12:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040205211212.GG11683@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040205210907.GB1541@elf.ucw.cz>

On Thu, Feb 05 2004, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > > > I believe he meant to write he umounted it.
> > > > > The problem is that there is still some data left in CDRW's cache and it 
> > > > > needs to be emptied. That happens when CDRW is ejected and reinserted 
> > > > > (that is why windows burning software ie. Nero wants to eject the CDR/RW 
> > > > > when it gets written or erased).
> > > > > Maybe kernel could flush the buffers/caches or whatever is there when 
> > > > > CDROM gets mounted. But im afraid about compatibility with broken drives 
> > > > > such as LG.
> > > > 
> > > > There's no command to invalidate read cache, you are probably thinking
> > > > of the SYNC_CACHE command to flush dirty data to media (which is what LG
> > > > fucked up).
> > > > 
> > > > IMO, it's a user problem.
> > > 
> > > Does not look like so.
> > > 
> > > mount
> > > umount
> > > cdrecord -blank
> > > mount
> > > see old data
> > > 
> > > That looks pretty bad. If there's no other solution, we might just
> > > document it, but...
> > 
> > Nonsense. Even if the above was what the user did (I believe he didn't
> > umount the device before blanking it), then it'd be a hardware "bug".
> > It's common to require an eject to completely clear the cache.
> 
> Later in the thread user said he did indeed do umount, and it is
> reproducible for him.
> 
> Okay, we may be dealing with the buggy hardware at this point. Would
> it make sense to tell the drive to flush it caches? If there's no
> other possibility, we might want cdrecord to reset drive at the end of
> blank and/or to make it eject...

Just have cdrecord eject the disc, it's pretty common. Resetting the
drive is a bit drastic, imho.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-05 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-03 13:18 2.6.0, cdrom still showing directories after being erased Martin Povolný
2004-02-03 13:31 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-03 13:45 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-03 15:00   ` Tomas Zvala
2004-02-03 15:24     ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-03 15:45       ` Tomas Zvala
2004-02-03 16:02       ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 16:17         ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-03 16:35           ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 17:46             ` Martin Povolný
2004-02-03 18:02               ` Martin Povolný
2004-02-03 18:53               ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 19:03                 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-03 20:35                   ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-03 20:59                     ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 22:40                     ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-03 23:05                       ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-02-04  7:37                         ` John Bradford
2004-02-05 23:31                           ` Eduard Bloch
2004-02-06  7:58                             ` John Bradford
2004-02-08 10:15                               ` Eduard Bloch
2004-02-08 10:32                                 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-08 11:06                                 ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 22:03                   ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-03 19:31               ` Tomas Zvala
2004-02-03 19:09             ` Derek Foreman
2004-02-03 19:51               ` Martin Povolný
2004-02-03 19:56                 ` Fox!MURDER
     [not found]                   ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402031358450.770@uberdeity>
2004-02-03 21:07                     ` Tomas Zvala
2004-02-03 15:28     ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 18:23       ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-05 20:04         ` John Bradford
2004-02-05 21:06           ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-05 21:36             ` John Bradford
2004-02-05 20:41         ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 21:09           ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-05 21:12             ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2004-02-05 21:17               ` Pavel Machek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-05 20:33 Thomas Glanzmann
2004-02-05 20:54 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 21:16   ` Thomas Glanzmann
2004-02-05 21:29     ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 21:41     ` John Bradford
2004-02-13 23:19   ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-05 21:24 Thomas Glanzmann
2004-02-05 21:31 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040205211212.GG11683@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=tomas@zvala.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.