From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Eduard Bloch <edi@gmx.de>
Cc: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing Lists <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0, cdrom still showing directories after being erased
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 11:32:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040208103222.GX11683@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040208101557.GA25053@zombie.inka.de>
On Sun, Feb 08 2004, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Moin John!
> John Bradford schrieb am Friday, den 06. February 2004:
>
> > > > unmounted before an erase, when it is re-mounted, the stale data is
> > > > read from the device's own cache, which should have been invalidated
> > > > by the erase.
> > >
> > > Is it realy a hardware issue?
> >
> > I originally thought so, but maybe I was wrong. Jens posted a patch
> > to invalidate kernel buffers on an umount - if the problem persists
> > with that patch, I still believe it is a hardware fault.
>
> And I don't. One of the cdrtools Debian maintainers just wrote that the
> patch does NOT solve the problem with the scenario described above in
> the thread.
Perhaps another program has the device open still? In that case, we
don't invalidate the toc cache.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-08 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-03 13:18 2.6.0, cdrom still showing directories after being erased Martin Povolný
2004-02-03 13:31 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-03 13:45 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-03 15:00 ` Tomas Zvala
2004-02-03 15:24 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-03 15:45 ` Tomas Zvala
2004-02-03 16:02 ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 16:17 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-03 16:35 ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 17:46 ` Martin Povolný
2004-02-03 18:02 ` Martin Povolný
2004-02-03 18:53 ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 19:03 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-03 20:35 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-03 20:59 ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 22:40 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-03 23:05 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-02-04 7:37 ` John Bradford
2004-02-05 23:31 ` Eduard Bloch
2004-02-06 7:58 ` John Bradford
2004-02-08 10:15 ` Eduard Bloch
2004-02-08 10:32 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2004-02-08 11:06 ` John Bradford
2004-02-03 22:03 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-03 19:31 ` Tomas Zvala
2004-02-03 19:09 ` Derek Foreman
2004-02-03 19:51 ` Martin Povolný
2004-02-03 19:56 ` Fox!MURDER
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402031358450.770@uberdeity>
2004-02-03 21:07 ` Tomas Zvala
2004-02-03 15:28 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 18:23 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-05 20:04 ` John Bradford
2004-02-05 21:06 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-05 21:36 ` John Bradford
2004-02-05 20:41 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 21:09 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-05 21:12 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 21:17 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-05 20:33 Thomas Glanzmann
2004-02-05 20:54 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 21:16 ` Thomas Glanzmann
2004-02-05 21:29 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-05 21:41 ` John Bradford
2004-02-13 23:19 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-05 21:24 Thomas Glanzmann
2004-02-05 21:31 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040208103222.GX11683@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=edi@gmx.de \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.