From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: mporter@kernel.crashing.org, lists@mdiehl.de,
dsaxena@plexity.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] dma_sync_to_device
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:30:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040211113015.2b91bd89.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040211122319.B5618@home.com>
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:23:19 -0700
Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:30:56AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
> > 1) pci_map_single(), device DMA's from the buffer.
> >
> > 2) pci_dma_sync_single(). Cpu writes some new command or
> > status flag into the buffer.
> >
> > 3) pci_dma_sync_to_device_single(), now device is asked to DMA from the buffer
> > again.
>
> Actually, not yet. Is it not possible for MIPS to determine the correct
> cache operation to use if step #3 used a pci_dma_sync_single() with a
> TO_DEVICE direction?
It should do a writeback of dirty data from the cpu cache, so that the device
may see it after pci_dma_sync_to_device_single() completes.
> I'm guessing that MIPS must have some kind of bridge cache in order to
> require the pci_dma_sync_to_device_single() if I'm starting to follow
> this.
Some platforms do, some don't. Sparc64 has PCI controller DMA caches but it's
cpu caches are fully coherent, for example. On such a platform this new interface
is going to be a NOP, but on things like MIPS it will not be.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-11 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-10 17:31 [Patch] dma_sync_to_device Martin Diehl
2004-02-10 18:42 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-10 18:59 ` Martin Diehl
2004-02-11 6:17 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-02-11 6:51 ` Martin Diehl
2004-02-11 16:39 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-02-11 17:51 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-11 18:18 ` Matt Porter
2004-02-11 18:30 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-11 18:57 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-02-11 19:08 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-12 3:46 ` Deepak Saxena
2004-02-12 3:58 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-13 1:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-14 7:24 ` David S. Miller
2004-02-11 19:23 ` Matt Porter
2004-02-11 19:30 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-02-11 18:43 ` linux-2.6.2 Kernel Problem Elikster
2004-02-14 11:51 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-13 14:27 [Patch] dma_sync_to_device James Bottomley
2004-02-14 8:51 ` Martin Diehl
2004-02-14 22:34 ` James Bottomley
2004-02-14 23:18 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040211113015.2b91bd89.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=dsaxena@plexity.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@mdiehl.de \
--cc=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.