All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Thornber <thornber@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>,
	Joe Thornber <thornber@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kthread vs. dm-daemon (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:48:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040216134826.GE28615@reti> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040216034250.EDCC82C053@lists.samba.org>

On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 02:02:04PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Yes, looks like dm-daemon is a workqueue.

Agreed.  I think (hope) we can get rid of dm-daemon entirely.

- Joe

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-16 13:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-11 15:33 Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.* Michal Kwolek
2004-02-11 18:41 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-15  2:35   ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-15 14:51     ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-15 16:38       ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-16  0:26       ` James Morris
2004-02-18 14:07         ` Bill Davidsen
2004-02-16 12:22       ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-17 14:09         ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-17 19:14           ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-18 14:06             ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-18 21:40               ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-19 13:34                 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-11 22:54 ` bill davidsen
2004-02-15 17:34 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 18:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-15 18:42     ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 18:53       ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-15 19:36         ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 19:46           ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-15 20:24             ` kthread vs. dm-daemon (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 22:13               ` kthread vs. dm-daemon Mike Christie
2004-02-16  0:04                 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16  1:04                   ` Mike Christie
2004-02-16  1:29                     ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16  3:02               ` kthread vs. dm-daemon (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Rusty Russell
2004-02-16 13:27                 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 16:42                   ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 13:48                 ` Joe Thornber [this message]
2004-02-16  1:44             ` dm-crypt using kthread " Christophe Saout
2004-02-16  1:53               ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-16  2:07                 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-02-16  3:03                   ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16  3:22                     ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-02-16  4:05                       ` dm-crypt using kthread Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16  4:14                         ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-02-16 10:15                           ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16  9:54                       ` dm-crypt using kthread (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Christophe Saout
2004-03-01 22:18                     ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-03-01 22:51                       ` Christophe Saout
2004-03-01 23:22                         ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-02-16  2:58                 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16  7:28                   ` David Wagner
2004-02-16 10:11                     ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-18 14:15                 ` dm-crypt using kthread Bill Davidsen
2004-02-16  2:07               ` dm-crypt using kthread (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Andrew Morton
2004-02-16  2:17                 ` dm-crypt using kthread Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16  2:53                 ` dm-crypt using kthread (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Christophe Saout
2004-02-16  2:10               ` dm-crypt using kthread Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16  2:40                 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16  2:58                   ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16  3:10                     ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 13:04                     ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 19:09                       ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040216134826.GE28615@reti \
    --to=thornber@redhat.com \
    --cc=christophe@saout.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.