From: Jari Ruusu <jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Jan Rychter <jan@rychter.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 16:06:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4033714A.FFFEBD6C@users.sourceforge.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m24qtpikmd.fsf@tnuctip.rychter.com
Jan Rychter wrote:
> Jari> Do you mind doing a a quick grep:
>
> Jari> cd /path/to/your/kernel/source grep "Jari Ruusu"
> Jari> drivers/block/loop.c
>
> Jari> If you see my name there, your kerneli.org cryptoapi enabled
> Jari> kernel is running same loop code I wrote years ago. Those
> Jari> loop-jari-something patches that you find on the net, are just
> Jari> copies of old loop-AES code.
>
> No, it is not running this code. The code that works well for me is the
> external cryptoapi (as modules) with last update in Feb 2002.
Then you are running loop that fails in few seconds using my tests.
> How do you get a file-backed encrypted filesystem to work under Linux
> 2.4.24?
Writable file backed loops received death sentence when GFP_NOFS was
introduced to kernel, and they have been on death row since then. The best
way is to set up partition backed loop using loop-AES. Mainline loop is
still prone to deadlock, both file backed and device backed.
--
Jari Ruusu 1024R/3A220F51 5B 4B F9 BB D3 3F 52 E9 DB 1D EB E3 24 0E A9 DD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-18 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-11 15:33 Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.* Michal Kwolek
2004-02-11 18:41 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-15 2:35 ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-15 14:51 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-15 16:38 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-16 0:26 ` James Morris
2004-02-18 14:07 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-02-16 12:22 ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-17 14:09 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-17 19:14 ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-18 14:06 ` Jari Ruusu [this message]
2004-02-18 21:40 ` Jan Rychter
2004-02-19 13:34 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-02-11 22:54 ` bill davidsen
2004-02-15 17:34 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-15 18:42 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 18:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-15 19:36 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 19:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-15 20:24 ` kthread vs. dm-daemon (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Christophe Saout
2004-02-15 22:13 ` kthread vs. dm-daemon Mike Christie
2004-02-16 0:04 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 1:04 ` Mike Christie
2004-02-16 1:29 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 3:02 ` kthread vs. dm-daemon (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Rusty Russell
2004-02-16 13:27 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 16:42 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 13:48 ` Joe Thornber
2004-02-16 1:44 ` dm-crypt using kthread " Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 1:53 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-16 2:07 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-02-16 3:03 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 3:22 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-02-16 4:05 ` dm-crypt using kthread Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 4:14 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2004-02-16 10:15 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 9:54 ` dm-crypt using kthread (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Christophe Saout
2004-03-01 22:18 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-03-01 22:51 ` Christophe Saout
2004-03-01 23:22 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-02-16 2:58 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 7:28 ` David Wagner
2004-02-16 10:11 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-18 14:15 ` dm-crypt using kthread Bill Davidsen
2004-02-16 2:07 ` dm-crypt using kthread (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Andrew Morton
2004-02-16 2:17 ` dm-crypt using kthread Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 2:53 ` dm-crypt using kthread (was: Oopsing cryptoapi (or loop device?) on 2.6.*) Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 2:10 ` dm-crypt using kthread Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 2:40 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 2:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-16 3:10 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 13:04 ` Christophe Saout
2004-02-16 19:09 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4033714A.FFFEBD6C@users.sourceforge.net \
--to=jariruusu@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jan@rychter.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.