All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Large slab cache in 2.6.1
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 18:36:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040222023638.GA13840@dingdong.cryptoapps.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4037FCDA.4060501@matchmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 04:50:34PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:

> I have 1.5 GB of ram in this system that will be a Linux Terminal
> Server (but using Debian & VNC).  There's 600MB+ anonymous memory,
> 600MB+ slab cache, and 100MB page cache.  That's after turning off
> swap (it was 400MB into swap at the time).

I have a similar annoying problem...  I have a machine which is almost
always idle (single user work station type thing) with 1.5GB of RAM
and I end up with 850M in slab!

For me the main problem seems to be driven by dentry_cache itself
bloating up really big and those entries keep fs-specific memory
pinned.

Forcing paging will push this down to acceptable levels but it's a
really irritating solution --- I'm still trying to think of a better
way to stop the dentries from using such a disproportionate amount of
memory.

I'm played with -mm kernels and various patches out there...  nothing
seems to put enough pressure on the slab unless I force paging.

akpm, riel --- any (more) ideas here?



  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-22  2:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-22  0:50 Large slab cache in 2.6.1 Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  1:09 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  1:20   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-02-22  2:03     ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  2:17       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-02-22  2:38         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:46           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-02-22  2:40         ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  2:58           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:33       ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:46         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:54           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:36 ` Chris Wedgwood [this message]
2004-02-22  3:03   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-22  3:11     ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  3:28       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-22  3:29         ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  3:31         ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  4:01           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  4:10             ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  4:30               ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  4:41                 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  5:37                   ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  5:44                     ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  5:52                       ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  5:50                     ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  6:01                       ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  6:17                         ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22  6:35                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  6:57                             ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22  7:20                               ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  8:36                             ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  9:13                               ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23  0:16                                 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-23  0:26                                   ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23  0:34                                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-23  0:46                                       ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23  0:54                                         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-23  1:00                                           ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23  1:06                                             ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  6:45                         ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  6:58                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  7:20                             ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  6:09                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22 17:05                   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-23  0:29                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  6:15         ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22 16:08           ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-22 17:55             ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-23  3:45               ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22 21:13             ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-02-22 14:03         ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-02-23  2:28           ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-23  3:33             ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-02-22  3:21     ` Mike Fedyk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-22 11:00 Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040222023638.GA13840@dingdong.cryptoapps.com \
    --to=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.