All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Large slab cache in 2.6.1
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 22:45:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4038501F.7090405@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <403845CB.8040805@cyberone.com.au>

Nick Piggin wrote:

> 
> 
> Mike Fedyk wrote:
> 
>> Nick Piggin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Mike Fedyk wrote:
>>>
>>>> What is the kernel parameter to disable highmem?  I saw nohighio, 
>>>> but that's not it...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not sure. That defeats the purpose of trying to get your setup
>>> working nicely though ;)
>>>
>>> Can you upgrade to 2.6.3-mm2? It would be ideal if you could
>>> test this patch against that kernel due to the other VM changes.
>>
>>
>>
>> I can test on another machine, but it doesn't have as much memory, and 
>> I'd have to use highmem emulation.
>>
> 
> Probably not worth the bother. It is easy enough for anyone to
> test random things, but the reason your feedback is so important
> is because you are actually *using* the system.

I completely understand what you're saying.  I have seen enough threads 
where someone refused to test patches.  So let me be more specific.

I'll have to test the kernel on two other machines for a few days before 
I put it on this particular machine.  Unfortunately, both of them have < 
1.5GB ram.

So let me know which patches are most likely to fix this problem.

PS, if I can apply them to my 2.6.1 kernel, then I wouldn't have to run 
the base kernel to compare changes of 2.6.1 -> 2.6.3 -> 2.6.3-mm -> your 
patch.

Each step would require a week-day to get a fair compairison.

Mike


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-02-22  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-22  0:50 Large slab cache in 2.6.1 Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  1:09 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  1:20   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-02-22  2:03     ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  2:17       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-02-22  2:38         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:46           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-02-22  2:40         ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  2:58           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:33       ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:46         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:54           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  2:36 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  3:03   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-22  3:11     ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  3:28       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-22  3:29         ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  3:31         ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  4:01           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  4:10             ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  4:30               ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  4:41                 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  5:37                   ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  5:44                     ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  5:52                       ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  5:50                     ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  6:01                       ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  6:17                         ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22  6:35                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  6:57                             ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22  7:20                               ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  8:36                             ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-02-22  9:13                               ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23  0:16                                 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-23  0:26                                   ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23  0:34                                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-23  0:46                                       ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23  0:54                                         ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-23  1:00                                           ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23  1:06                                             ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  6:45                         ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2004-02-22  6:58                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  7:20                             ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22  6:09                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22 17:05                   ` Linus Torvalds
2004-02-23  0:29                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-22  6:15         ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-22 16:08           ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-22 17:55             ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-23  3:45               ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-22 21:13             ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-02-22 14:03         ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-02-23  2:28           ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-23  3:33             ` Ed Tomlinson
2004-02-22  3:21     ` Mike Fedyk
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-22 11:00 Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4038501F.7090405@matchmail.com \
    --to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.