From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim Wilson <wilson@specifixinc.com>,
Judith Lebzelter <judith@osdl.org>, Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>,
cliff white <cliffw@osdl.org>,
"Timothy D. Witham" <wookie@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel Cross Compiling [update]
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 09:07:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040222090711.A11210@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040222035350.GB31813@MAIL.13thfloor.at>; from herbert@13thfloor.at on Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:53:50AM +0100
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:53:50AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> interesting is that some architectures (arm, chris, v850)
> do not even have an appropriate default config
For some (eg ARM) one single default config makes zero sense. I've
been debating about removing arch/arm/defconfig for this reason; we
have a whole host of machine default configurations in arch/arm/config
to serve this purpose.
> linux-2.4.25
> config dep kernel modules
>
> alpha/alpha: OK OK OK OK
> arm/arm: OK OK FAILED FAILED
ARM is not expected to build in 2.4 kernels, and probably never will.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-22 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-22 3:53 Kernel Cross Compiling [update] Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 6:02 ` Dan Kegel
2004-02-22 15:42 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 8:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-02-22 9:07 ` Russell King [this message]
2004-02-22 15:09 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 12:45 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2004-02-22 15:22 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 15:52 ` Paul Mundt
2004-02-22 17:07 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 17:23 ` Paul Mundt
2004-02-23 13:28 ` Richard Curnow
2004-02-23 14:41 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-26 13:02 ` Richard Curnow
2004-02-23 19:42 ` Jim Wilson
2004-02-23 20:32 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-24 1:49 ` Dan Kegel
2004-02-24 8:53 ` Herbert Poetzl
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-22 16:36 Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040222090711.A11210@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=cliffw@osdl.org \
--cc=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=judith@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wilson@specifixinc.com \
--cc=wookie@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.