From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim Wilson <wilson@specifixinc.com>,
Judith Lebzelter <judith@osdl.org>, Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>,
cliff white <cliffw@osdl.org>,
"Timothy D. Witham" <wookie@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel Cross Compiling [update]
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:52:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040222155209.GA11162@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040222035350.GB31813@MAIL.13thfloor.at>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1099 bytes --]
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 04:53:50AM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> linux-2.6.3-rc3 linux-2.6.3
> config build config build
>
> sh/sh: OK FAILED OK FAILED
> sh64/sh: OK FAILED OK FAILED
sh64 doesn't exist in 2.6 yet, attempting to build a kernel for it is futile.
> others seem to require different? binutils (sh and sh64)
>
sh and sh64 require completely different toolchains. They're very different
platforms, and have very little in common.
> linux-2.4.25
> config dep kernel modules
>
> sh/sh: OK OK FAILED FAILED
These are due to erroring on .rept usage for filling in the sys_call_table in
arch/sh/kernel/entry.S, in 2.6 we've already cleaned this up in the LinuxSH
tree by just dropping it and padding out for NR_syscalls, I suppose something
similar will have to be done in the 2.4 case..
> sh64/sh64: OK OK FAILED FAILED
>
The sh64 build errors according to logs[7] are issues with your toolchain,
binutils in particular.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-22 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-22 3:53 Kernel Cross Compiling [update] Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 6:02 ` Dan Kegel
2004-02-22 15:42 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 8:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-02-22 9:07 ` Russell King
2004-02-22 15:09 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 12:45 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2004-02-22 15:22 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 15:52 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2004-02-22 17:07 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-22 17:23 ` Paul Mundt
2004-02-23 13:28 ` Richard Curnow
2004-02-23 14:41 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-26 13:02 ` Richard Curnow
2004-02-23 19:42 ` Jim Wilson
2004-02-23 20:32 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-02-24 1:49 ` Dan Kegel
2004-02-24 8:53 ` Herbert Poetzl
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-22 16:36 Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040222155209.GA11162@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=cliffw@osdl.org \
--cc=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=judith@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wilson@specifixinc.com \
--cc=wookie@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.