Windows Broadcast

Windows Broadcast

[Eric Leblond]

[-- Attachment #1: clearsigned data --]
[-- Type: Text/Plain, Size: 822 bytes --]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

>As a broadcast packet is a packet internal to a network, it don't have
>to go through a router, so it will go on INPUT chain.

If I have two networks with windows machines without wins server, what I can 
do with iptables to permit broadcats packets for netbios name resolve.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iQEVAwUBQENEx+Xb9tKkwh23AQJ86QgAlQ8OV0J3nhKeC+O8fMArDmnR4qAlCoPa
ZkQ4d4Ly0uyUcBFu+4ZjqHW4SijXgzFhQcD2gdTdWF9fqo9udS+pa5iPR9p8bkgR
fhpWXQU5N+H7RO0IxV6GhPt84v8+J8BHwS1MgdslVXGdFgkPSjZlQ7QSEHcgYJHQ
2UMNuDtBJaHJncXO17zE7++MQnUfExak3PwaTkIYk0sSkKL+nqA2W+8qDYN/5K1A
VumPUgKRuuX2OQJeD8XGlqy8ltLG99ztSPgyCVhJjUGf8Vmqe9q6lle65tPuWPtK
aULvEVguHQstJ9WIjV9VBtPXj6vV+ScG7pniq/NRyS4d4vpOMsYAtA==
=rHkP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[-- Attachment #2: Ceci est une partie de =?utf-8?q?message =3D=3FISO-8859-1=3FQ=3Fnum= =?utf-8?q?3DE9riquement=3D3F=3D3D=3F=3D --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 318 bytes --]

?=
 =?utf-8?q?=20=3D=3Futf-8=3Fq=3F=3D20=3D3D=3D3FISO-8859-1=3D3FQ=3D3F=3D5Fs?=
 =?utf-8?q?ign=3D3DE9e=3D3D2E=3D3F=3D3D=3F=3D?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAQzyznxA7CdMWjzIRAglCAJ4ho9KKX4/153fkNMwBVhlfyN7EOwCcC3Sg
yo5HICQ/90sQ2K7h/w/Go20=
=Ss+3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Windows Broadcast

[Alexis]

i think that a good aproach could be to use an internal dns in order to
resolve the name and then you could use netbios over tcp to get routed
to the other lan.


A broadcast will not pass the router.

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 11:12, Eric Leblond wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> >As a broadcast packet is a packet internal to a network, it don't have
> >to go through a router, so it will go on INPUT chain.
> 
> If I have two networks with windows machines without wins server, what I can 
> do with iptables to permit broadcats packets for netbios name resolve.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
> 
> iQEVAwUBQENEx+Xb9tKkwh23AQJ86QgAlQ8OV0J3nhKeC+O8fMArDmnR4qAlCoPa
> ZkQ4d4Ly0uyUcBFu+4ZjqHW4SijXgzFhQcD2gdTdWF9fqo9udS+pa5iPR9p8bkgR
> fhpWXQU5N+H7RO0IxV6GhPt84v8+J8BHwS1MgdslVXGdFgkPSjZlQ7QSEHcgYJHQ
> 2UMNuDtBJaHJncXO17zE7++MQnUfExak3PwaTkIYk0sSkKL+nqA2W+8qDYN/5K1A
> VumPUgKRuuX2OQJeD8XGlqy8ltLG99ztSPgyCVhJjUGf8Vmqe9q6lle65tPuWPtK
> aULvEVguHQstJ9WIjV9VBtPXj6vV+ScG7pniq/NRyS4d4vpOMsYAtA==
> =rHkP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
Tus problemas no se pueden resolver en el mismo
nivel mental que tenías cuando los creaste. 
		Albert Einstein

Windows Broadcast

[Попов Игорь Николаевич]

>As a broadcast packet is a packet internal to a network, it don't have
>to go through a router, so it will go on INPUT chain.

If I have two networks with windows machines without wins server, what I can
do with iptables to permit broadcats packets for netbios name resolve.
__________
www.newmail.ru -- Новая Почта для нового поколения.

Re: Windows Broadcast

[Antony Stone]

On Monday 01 March 2004 2:15 pm, Попов Игорь Николаевич wrote:

> >As a broadcast packet is a packet internal to a network, it don't have
> >to go through a router, so it will go on INPUT chain.
>
> If I have two networks with windows machines without wins server, what I
> can do with iptables to permit broadcats packets for netbios name resolve.

Set up a bridge?

Depends on your subnet addressing arrangements (and why they are two networks 
anyway...)

Antony.

-- 
Christmas was just an opportunity to upgrade to kernel 2.6 while no-one was 
around to notice the downtime.

                                                     Please reply to the list;
                                                           please don't CC me.