From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Cpufreq mailing list <cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
davej@codemonkey.ork.uk
Cc: paul.devriendt@amd.com
Subject: Re: powernow-k8-acpi driver
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:35:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040303223510.GE222@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040303222712.GA16874@redhat.com>
On St 03-03-04 22:27:12, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 10:54:36PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Lots of machines have broken PST tables, so current in-kernel driver
> > refuses to works on them. Vendors do get ACPI tables right because
> > apparently Windows use them ;-). So this driver tends to work.
> >
> > Comments? Could we get this into mainline?
>
> I really dislike the idea of having >1 driver for this.
> Why can't we have a "use_acpi" module_param to switch to this ?
Well, that would probably not even link on kernel without ACPI...
We could make that functionality depend on CONFIG_ACPI, and allow
runtime selection only if its defined... But those two drivers are
pretty different just now and acpi-dependend chunk is pretty big. (It
does funny stuff like polling for AC plug removal if we are in
high-power state and battery would not handle that. Old driver simply
refused to use high-power states on such machines.)
Pavel
--
When do you have a heart between your knees?
[Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-03 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-03 21:54 powernow-k8-acpi driver Pavel Machek
2004-03-03 22:27 ` Dave Jones
2004-03-03 22:35 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2004-03-03 22:48 ` Dave Jones
2004-03-03 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-03 23:36 ` Dave Jones
2004-03-04 0:07 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-04 9:38 ` Russell King
2004-03-05 19:18 ` Bruno Ducrot
2004-03-07 13:15 ` Colin Marquardt
2004-03-03 23:09 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-03 23:11 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-03 23:39 ` Dave Jones
2004-03-03 23:45 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-03 23:26 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-03-03 23:48 paul.devriendt
2004-03-04 12:35 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-03 23:57 paul.devriendt
2004-03-04 13:44 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-04 2:00 richard.brunner
2004-03-04 23:16 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040303223510.GE222@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.ork.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.devriendt@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.