All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Does Postmark correctly model email workloads
@ 2004-03-19  4:14 Yusuf Goolamabbas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Yusuf Goolamabbas @ 2004-03-19  4:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nfs

Looking at the source of Postmark, I don't see any fsync/O_SYNC calls. 
MTA's are very fsync intensive. As such, I am not sure if Postmark
correctly models email-intensive workloads or have I missed something
obvious ?

Paper/source on Postmark available here

http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3022.print

Charles, any comments ? 

Regards, Yusuf


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-03-19  4:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-19  4:14 Does Postmark correctly model email workloads Yusuf Goolamabbas

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.