All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: tiwai@suse.de, Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
	Robert Love <rml@ximian.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU for low latency (experimental)
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:15:52 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040323104552.GE3676@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1080038105.5296.8.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>

On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:35:06AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
> > Reduce bh processing time of rcu callbacks by using tunable per-cpu
> > krcud daemeons.
> 
> why not just use work queues ?

No particular reason other than that I wanted to experiment with
the priority of the kernel threads when we test it under heavy load.
If all these are deemed necessary, I will clean it up.

There is one minor irritant - I need to check if the worker thread
for my cpu is running or not. I will have to add something to do
that since this whole thing is conditional and also RCU is initialized
before workqueues.

Thanks
Dipankar


  reply	other threads:[~2004-03-23 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-23 10:17 [PATCH] RCU for low latency (experimental) Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-23 10:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-23 10:41   ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-23 10:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-23 10:45   ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2004-03-23 12:31   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-23 12:40     ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-23 12:50       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-24 17:26         ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-03-24 17:51           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-24 20:02             ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-03-24 23:36               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-25  0:43                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-03-24 21:39             ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-24 22:53               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-24 23:11                 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-24 23:34                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-24 23:46                     ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-24 23:51                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-28 16:53                       ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-28 17:20                         ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-28 17:28                           ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-29 10:43                             ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-29 12:20                               ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-23 12:40     ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-23 12:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-23 12:34   ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-23 12:46     ` Andrea Arcangeli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040323104552.GE3676@in.ibm.com \
    --to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rml@ximian.com \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.