From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>,
Robert Love <rml@ximian.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RCU for low latency (experimental)
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:50:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040329122045.GB3683@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hvfkovsqo.wl@alsa2.suse.de>
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 12:43:11PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Sun, 28 Mar 2004 19:28:41 +0200,
> I wrote:
> >
> > > > anyway, i confirmed that with the original krcud patch the latency
> > > > with dcache flood can be eliminated.
> > >
> > > Does the throttle-rcu patch also help eliminate dcache flood ? You
> > > can try by just changing count >= rcumaxbatch to ++count > rcumaxbatch.
> >
> > i'll try it later.
>
> the throttle-rcu patch does work indeed well even without preemption.
> i've tested maxbatch=16 and plugticks=0. in the older version, there
> was 20ms long latency, while in the patched version, no measurable
> latency more than 1ms.
Thanks for the measurements. throttle-rcu may eventually be the way
to go, but I would wait until we have sorted out several other problems
like route cache DoS testing that we are looking at currently.
Thanks
Dipankar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-29 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-23 10:17 [PATCH] RCU for low latency (experimental) Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-23 10:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-23 10:41 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-23 10:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-23 10:45 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-23 12:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-23 12:40 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-23 12:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-24 17:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-03-24 17:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-24 20:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-03-24 23:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-25 0:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-03-24 21:39 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-24 22:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-24 23:11 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-24 23:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-24 23:46 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-24 23:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-28 16:53 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-28 17:20 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-28 17:28 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-29 10:43 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-03-29 12:20 ` Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2004-03-23 12:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-23 12:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-23 12:34 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-03-23 12:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040329122045.GB3683@in.ibm.com \
--to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=rml@ximian.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.