From: Karol Kozimor <sziwan@hell.org.pl>
To: Michael Frank <mhf@linuxmail.org>
Cc: ncunningham@users.sourceforge.net,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Swsusp mailing list <swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 10:32:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040324093231.GA15061@hell.org.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <opr5cry20s4evsfm@smtp.pacific.net.th>
Thus wrote Michael Frank:
> Which reminds me of the "failed to read a chunk" message, the guys who
> reported
> it got all quiet after telling them to do more badblocks testing without
> diskcaching or
> using dd to write random data and read them back, so likely was caused by
> media problems.
I'm not so sure, at least in my case. Sure, badblocks /dev/hda1 reports an
access beyond end, but neither badblocks /dev/hda1 $SIZEOF_HDA1 nor SMART
do. Anyway, the alleged bad blocks are at the end of a 400 MB partition, so
unless swsusp allocated swap randomly, there's hardly any chance I could
hit them with 256 MB RAM and LZF on. But then, this failure was a single
event in my case, while others reported some regularity.
Best regards,
--
Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor
sziwan@hell.org.pl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-24 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1079659165.15559.34.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
[not found] ` <20040318193703.4c02f7f5.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <1079661410.15557.38.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
[not found] ` <20040318200513.287ebcf0.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <1079664318.15559.41.camel@calvin.wpcb.org.au>
2004-03-21 22:00 ` swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Pavel Machek
2004-03-22 0:29 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-22 20:55 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-22 23:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 9:53 ` [Swsusp-devel] " Jonathan Sambrook
2004-03-23 15:25 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-23 21:47 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 21:08 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 22:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 22:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 23:07 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-23 23:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 22:36 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 23:45 ` Dumitru Ciobarcianu
2004-03-23 22:52 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-24 0:05 ` Joel Jaeggli
2004-03-23 23:10 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 22:43 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-03-23 23:32 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-23 22:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-23 23:44 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 3:12 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 10:17 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 22:46 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 23:23 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 23:56 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 0:23 ` -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 0:50 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 1:41 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <200403250857.08920.matthias.wieser@hiasl.net>
2004-03-25 20:39 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-25 22:27 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 21:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-25 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 5:59 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-26 10:50 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 13:17 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-27 14:49 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-29 12:10 ` fast compressed fs (was Re: -nice tree) Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 5:59 ` -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Michael Frank
2004-03-26 10:22 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 20:30 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-26 22:22 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-27 2:08 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-27 3:37 ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 4:28 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-27 4:40 ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 19:50 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-27 20:03 ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 21:01 ` Paranoia is fun [Was Re: -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]]] Michael Frank
2004-03-27 21:40 ` Luke-Jr
2004-03-27 21:29 ` -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]] Pavel Machek
2004-03-28 0:27 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-27 2:21 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-29 12:13 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 4:52 ` [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Dmitry Torokhov
2004-03-24 5:04 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-24 6:22 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 5:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-24 7:31 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-24 10:26 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 0:06 ` Jonathan Sambrook
2004-03-24 9:32 ` Karol Kozimor [this message]
2004-03-24 14:15 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 0:35 ` Karol Kozimor
2004-03-24 5:06 ` sleeping in request function mohanlal jangir
[not found] ` <20040324083313.GG3377@suse.de>
2004-03-25 3:45 ` mohanlal jangir
2004-03-24 10:22 ` [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 12:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-03-24 15:18 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 20:22 ` Jonathan Sambrook
2004-03-24 21:06 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 22:13 ` swsusp is not reliable. Face it. [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems] Pavel Machek
2004-03-25 21:33 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-03-25 22:52 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 5:59 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-26 9:59 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 10:21 ` Michael Frank
2004-03-25 22:08 ` [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?] Pavel Machek
2004-03-24 22:05 ` Markus Gaugusch
2004-03-24 21:25 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040324093231.GA15061@hell.org.pl \
--to=sziwan@hell.org.pl \
--cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhf@linuxmail.org \
--cc=ncunningham@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=swsusp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.