* RE: [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler issue
[not found] <200403260930.59284.efocht@hpce.nec.com>
@ 2004-03-28 10:06 ` shai
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: shai @ 2004-03-28 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Andrew Morton'
Cc: ricklind, mbligh, lse-tech, 'Erik Jacobson',
'Erich Focht', 'Paul Jackson',
'Xavier Bru', linux-kernel
Hi,
Very nice patch.
Andrew, would you consider adding this one?
--Shai
-----Original Message-----
From: lse-tech-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:lse-tech-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of Erich Focht
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 00:31
To: Paul Jackson; Xavier Bru
Cc: ricklind@us.ibm.com; mbligh@aracnet.com; lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net;
Erik Jacobson
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler issue
Hi Paul,
On Wednesday 24 March 2004 20:03, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Where are you getting the printouts that look like:
>
> initial CPU = 2
> cpu 18491 16
> cpu0 17125 2
> cpu1 441 0
> cpu2 700 14
> cpu3 225 0
> ...
> current_cpu 0
>
> We have something in our SGI 2.4 kernels (/proc/<pid>/cpu) that
> displays this sort of per-cpu usage, but I don't see anything
> in the 2.6 kernels that seems to do this.
its probably the attached patch. Sorry, I'm travelling and couldn't
rediff against a current version...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-03-28 10:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200403260930.59284.efocht@hpce.nec.com>
2004-03-28 10:06 ` [Lse-tech] Re: NUMA scheduler issue shai
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.