From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Bruno Ducrot <ducrot@poupinou.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
mark.langsdorf@amd.com,
Cpufreq mailing list <cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
paul.devriendt@amd.com,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>
Subject: Re: powernow-k8: support acpi
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 17:39:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040402163902.GC5688@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040402162447.GP19001@poupinou.org>
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 06:24:47PM +0200, Bruno Ducrot wrote:
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.5-rc3/2.6.5-rc3-mm4/broken-out/bk-cpufreq.patch)
> This is Dominik work. Not mine.
My apologies.. I got my wires crossed.
> > Would this driver be better off using that ?
>
> At first, yes, it's needed anyway for the SMP case if I'm correct (there is
> a flaw in how the v1.4 psb header have been changed wrt 1.2 that make that
> impossible apparently).
>
> But I can't say for sure which have to be favored: legacy or ACPI.
> I don't have enough dump of ACPI tables and PSB/PST from machines shipped
> with AMD64.
Ok. I think for the time being we'll roll with what Pavel has come up with.
We can always improve on it later, whichever way we decide to turn.
I'm about to disappear for a day or two. I'll look into integrating whats
outstanding on Sunday. Pavel, if you have time between now and then
to do a diff of whats remaining between your tree and the driver I posted
this afternoon, that would make my life a little easier.
thanks,
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-02 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <99F2150714F93F448942F9A9F112634C1163C8D7@txexmtae.amd.com>
[not found] ` <20040321185417.GA7969@dominikbrodowski.de>
2004-03-26 12:29 ` powernow-k8: support acpi Pavel Machek
2004-03-26 12:29 ` Pavel Machek
2004-03-27 0:36 ` Redeeman
2004-04-01 23:56 ` Dave Jones
2004-04-02 8:30 ` Pavel Machek
2004-04-02 9:02 ` Dave Jones
2004-04-02 11:13 ` Dave Jones
2004-04-02 16:24 ` Bruno Ducrot
2004-04-02 16:39 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2004-04-02 17:09 ` Pavel Machek
2004-04-06 13:07 ` Dave Jones
2004-04-06 14:55 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-04-06 15:47 ` Dave Jones
2004-04-06 16:55 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-04-06 17:05 ` Dave Jones
2004-04-06 21:57 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-04-08 13:11 ` Pavel Machek
2004-04-02 16:39 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-04-02 16:46 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-04-02 16:59 paul.devriendt
2004-04-02 18:40 ` Bruno Ducrot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040402163902.GC5688@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ducrot@poupinou.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.de \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
--cc=paul.devriendt@amd.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.