All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] call_usermodehelper hang
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 20:53:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040409205344.GA5236@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40770AD0.4000402@us.ibm.com>

On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 03:42:56PM -0500, Brian King wrote:
> Would you prefer a fix in call_usermodehelper itself? It could certainly
> be argued that calling call_usermodehelper with wait=0 should be allowed
> even when holding locks. Although, fixing it here is less obvious to me
> how to do because of the arguments to call_usermodehelper. I would imagine
> it would consist of creating a kernel_thread to preserve the caller's stack.

Yes, I think call_usermodehelper should be changed to create a new
kernel thread for every call.  That would solve this problem, and any
future races that might happen.  Care to work on that?

thanks,

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id\x1470&alloc_id638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Linux-hotplug-devel mailing list  http://linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net
Linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-hotplug-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] call_usermodehelper hang
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 13:53:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040409205344.GA5236@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40770AD0.4000402@us.ibm.com>

On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 03:42:56PM -0500, Brian King wrote:
> Would you prefer a fix in call_usermodehelper itself? It could certainly
> be argued that calling call_usermodehelper with wait=0 should be allowed
> even when holding locks. Although, fixing it here is less obvious to me
> how to do because of the arguments to call_usermodehelper. I would imagine
> it would consist of creating a kernel_thread to preserve the caller's stack.

Yes, I think call_usermodehelper should be changed to create a new
kernel thread for every call.  That would solve this problem, and any
future races that might happen.  Care to work on that?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2004-04-09 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-06 18:11 call_usermodehelper hang Brian King
2004-04-07  0:29 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-07  6:11   ` Greg KH
2004-04-07 14:00     ` Brian King
2004-04-07 22:58     ` [PATCH] " Brian King
2004-04-08 22:47       ` Greg KH
2004-04-08 22:47         ` Greg KH
2004-04-09 20:42         ` Brian King
2004-04-09 20:42           ` Brian King
2004-04-09 20:53           ` Greg KH [this message]
2004-04-09 20:53             ` Greg KH
2004-04-09 21:05             ` Brian King
2004-04-09 21:05               ` Brian King
2004-04-09 21:15             ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-09 21:15               ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-10 16:53               ` Greg KH
2004-04-10 16:53                 ` Greg KH
2004-04-10 20:11                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-10 20:11                   ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-12 15:25                   ` Brian King
2004-04-12 15:25                     ` Brian King
2004-04-12 17:46                     ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-12 17:46                       ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-16 17:55                       ` Brian King
2004-04-16 17:55                         ` Brian King
2004-04-12 18:49                   ` Greg KH
2004-04-12 18:49                     ` Greg KH
2004-04-08 23:17       ` Chris Wright
2004-04-07  0:41 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-07  1:46   ` Brian King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040409205344.GA5236@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-hotplug-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.