From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, manfred@colorfullife.com, davej@redhat.com,
wli@holomorphy.com,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
maneesh@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: dentry bloat.
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 13:11:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040509181122.GK5414@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405090832310.24865@ppc970.osdl.org>
On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 08:35:55AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 9 May 2004, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 8 May 2004, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > > 1: 5.04 % ( 5.04 % cum -- 2246)
> > > 2: 5.19 % ( 10.23 % cum -- 2312)
> >
> > Ok, risking to state the obvious - it was intentional to count "."s and
> > ".."s, wasn't it? Just this makes it a bit non-trivial to compare this
> > statistics with Andrew's.
>
> Ok, here's a version that doesn't count "." and "..". My numbers don't
> really change much for the kernel:
>
> and we've reached over 90% coverage with the 24-byte inline name.
I hacked up something and ran it on my webserver (which has something
like 200 shell accounts). My histogram peaked at 12 rather than 10 but
still hit 90% cumulative at 21 characters.
I suspect worst case is a large LAN fileserver with Samba shares and
whatnot, I suspect there are a large number of "A picture of my cute
puppy I took last summer.JPG" style filenames there. Anyone have stats
for such an FS?
--
Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : Linux development and consulting
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-09 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040506200027.GC26679@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20040506150944.126bb409.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <409B1511.6010500@colorfullife.com>
2004-05-08 8:23 ` dentry bloat Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 9:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:28 ` viro
2004-05-08 10:41 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:52 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:31 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-05-08 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-08 18:19 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-08 19:01 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-08 19:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-08 20:42 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-08 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 21:19 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-09 0:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-09 2:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 3:12 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-09 3:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 21:03 ` Matt Mackall
2004-05-10 8:27 ` Helge Hafting
2004-05-10 8:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-10 9:46 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-10 14:54 ` Matt Mackall
2004-05-10 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-05-10 18:34 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-09 4:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-09 4:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 4:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-09 5:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 7:36 ` Rodolfo Guluarte Hale
2004-05-09 9:10 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-05-09 9:23 ` viro
2004-05-09 15:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 18:11 ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2004-05-09 22:08 ` Francois Romieu
2004-05-09 23:51 ` Paul Jackson
2004-05-10 7:17 ` Florian Weimer
2004-05-10 14:12 ` Rik van Riel
2004-05-09 4:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 7:28 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-05-09 15:33 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-09 22:17 ` viro
2004-05-09 22:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-11 5:26 ` Maneesh Soni
2004-05-10 18:39 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-11 5:17 ` Maneesh Soni
2004-05-08 20:13 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-10-06 12:58 ` Maneesh Soni
2004-05-11 20:22 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-14 10:33 ` Raghavan
2004-05-14 10:50 ` Paul Jackson
2004-05-14 11:04 ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-14 11:14 ` Paul Jackson
2004-05-14 11:24 ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-14 11:30 ` Paul Jackson
2004-05-14 11:24 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-14 11:18 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-14 14:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-08 21:00 ` Dipankar Sarma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040509181122.GK5414@waste.org \
--to=mpm@selenic.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.