From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: raghav@in.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, maneesh@in.ibm.com,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, torvalds@osdl.org, manfred@colorfullife.com,
davej@redhat.com, wli@holomorphy.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dentry bloat.
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:04:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040514110427.GG17326@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040514035039.347871e8.pj@sgi.com>
On Fri, May 14 2004, Paul Jackson wrote:
> > Looks like the new hashing function has brought down the performance.
>
> "brought down the performance" as in "better, faster", right?
>
> That is, your numbers show that the new hashing function is good, right?
>
> Or do I have it backwards?
The numbers were ms/iteration, so I guess you do.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-14 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20040506200027.GC26679@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <20040506150944.126bb409.akpm@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <409B1511.6010500@colorfullife.com>
2004-05-08 8:23 ` dentry bloat Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 9:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:28 ` viro
2004-05-08 10:41 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:52 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 10:31 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-05-08 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-08 18:19 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-08 19:01 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-08 19:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-08 20:42 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-08 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 21:19 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-09 0:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-09 2:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 3:12 ` David S. Miller
2004-05-09 3:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 21:03 ` Matt Mackall
2004-05-10 8:27 ` Helge Hafting
2004-05-10 8:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-10 9:46 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-10 14:54 ` Matt Mackall
2004-05-10 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-05-10 18:34 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-09 4:12 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-09 4:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 4:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-09 5:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 7:36 ` Rodolfo Guluarte Hale
2004-05-09 9:10 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2004-05-09 9:23 ` viro
2004-05-09 15:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 18:11 ` Matt Mackall
2004-05-09 22:08 ` Francois Romieu
2004-05-09 23:51 ` Paul Jackson
2004-05-10 7:17 ` Florian Weimer
2004-05-10 14:12 ` Rik van Riel
2004-05-09 4:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-09 7:28 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-05-09 15:33 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-09 22:17 ` viro
2004-05-09 22:27 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-11 5:26 ` Maneesh Soni
2004-05-10 18:39 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-11 5:17 ` Maneesh Soni
2004-05-08 20:13 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-10-06 12:58 ` Maneesh Soni
2004-05-11 20:22 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-14 10:33 ` Raghavan
2004-05-14 10:50 ` Paul Jackson
2004-05-14 11:04 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2004-05-14 11:14 ` Paul Jackson
2004-05-14 11:24 ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-14 11:30 ` Paul Jackson
2004-05-14 11:24 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-14 11:18 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-05-14 14:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-05-08 21:00 ` Dipankar Sarma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040514110427.GG17326@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=raghav@in.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.