* Preempted by idle thread?
@ 2004-05-12 2:23 Nigel Cunningham
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Nigel Cunningham @ 2004-05-12 2:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Mailing List
Hi all.
I've been seeing some funny bad_scheduling_while_atomic messages that might be
my own fault (they only occur after suspending). The funny thing, though, is
that they are all the same, and show a calling chain:
schedule_tail -> preempt_schedule -> cpu_idle
Am I misunderstanding this, or is a thread being preempted by cpu_idle? If
that is the case, real work shouldn't be preempted to idle, should it?
Nigel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-05-12 2:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-12 2:23 Preempted by idle thread? Nigel Cunningham
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.