From: Alexey Kopytov <alexeyk@mysql.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linuxram@us.ibm.com, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, peter@mysql.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, axboe@suse.de
Subject: Re: Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 [patch+results]
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 08:43:17 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200405260843.17682.alexeyk@mysql.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405220113.31136.alexeyk@mysql.com>
On Saturday 22 May 2004 01:13, Alexey Kopytov wrote:
>I ran the tests with a configuration as close to yours as possible. Here are
>the results for mem=256M, 2G total file size (ext3):
>
>2.4.25:
> Time spent for test: 79.4146s
> 0.20user 16.08system 3:20.29elapsed 8%CPU
> Time spent for test: 78.9797s
> 0.11user 15.84system 3:19.76elapsed 7%CPU
>
>2.6.6-bk, AS:
> Time spent for test: 81.2208s
> 0.13user 17.97system 3:13.30elapsed 9%CPU
> Time spent for test: 82.5538s
> 0.14user 18.00system 3:14.88elapsed 9%CPU
>
>This correlates very well your results. But when I returned back to my
>original configuration (mem=640M, 3G total file size), I got the following:
>
>2.4.25:
> Time spent for test: 77.5377s
>
>2.6.6-bk, AS:
> Time spent for test: 83.1929s
>
>It seems like the smaller file size just hides the regression, but I have to
>run some more tests to ensure this.
>
The assumption appears to be true. I tried to vary the total file size and got
the following results (tests were done on another IDE disk):
2.4.27-pre3:
2 GB: 58.2707s
4 GB: 72.3313s
8 GB: 83.082s
2.6.7-rc1, AS:
2 GB: 60.6792s
4 GB: 82.8023s
8 GB: 99.4398s
Varying the number of files while keeping the total file size constant also
gives some interesting results:
2.4.27-pre3, 4 GB total file size:
1 file: 71.7288s
128 files: 72.3313s
256 files: 73.9268
2.6.7-rc1, AS, 4 GB total file size:
1 file: 76.443
128 files: 82.8023
256 files: 81.9618
--
Alexey Kopytov, Software Developer
MySQL AB, www.mysql.com
Are you MySQL certified? www.mysql.com/certification
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-26 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-02 19:57 Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-03 11:14 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-03 18:08 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-03 20:22 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-03 20:57 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-03 21:37 ` Peter Zaitsev
2004-05-03 21:50 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-03 22:01 ` Peter Zaitsev
2004-05-03 21:59 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-03 22:07 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-03 23:58 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-04 0:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-04 0:19 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-04 0:50 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-04 6:29 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-04 15:03 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-04 19:39 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-04 19:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-04 19:58 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-04 21:51 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-04 22:29 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-04 23:01 ` Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-04 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-05 22:04 ` Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-06 8:43 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-06 18:13 ` Peter Zaitsev
2004-05-06 21:49 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-06 23:49 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-07 1:29 ` Peter Zaitsev
2004-05-10 19:50 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-10 20:21 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-10 22:39 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-10 23:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-11 20:51 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-11 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-13 20:41 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-17 17:30 ` Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 [patch+results] Ram Pai
2004-05-20 1:06 ` Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-20 1:31 ` Ram Pai
2004-05-21 19:32 ` Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-20 5:49 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-20 21:59 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-20 22:23 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-21 7:31 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-21 7:50 ` Jens Axboe
2004-05-21 8:40 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-21 8:56 ` Spam: " Andrew Morton
2004-05-21 22:24 ` Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-21 21:13 ` Alexey Kopytov
2004-05-26 4:43 ` Alexey Kopytov [this message]
2004-05-11 22:26 ` Random file I/O regressions in 2.6 Bill Davidsen
2004-05-04 1:15 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-04 11:39 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-04 8:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-04 8:47 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-04 8:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200405260843.17682.alexeyk@mysql.com \
--to=alexeyk@mysql.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=peter@mysql.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.