From: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for AMD64?
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 19:57:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040528175724.GC9898@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17750000.1085766378@flay>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 234 bytes --]
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 10:46:18AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>
> Personally, I find the argument that it's hardware-specific control code
> a much better reason for it to belong in the kernel.
Is it really hardware specific ??
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-28 17:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-28 17:09 CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for AMD64? Nakajima, Jun
2004-05-28 17:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-28 17:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-28 17:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-28 17:57 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2004-05-28 19:51 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-05-28 19:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-28 20:14 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-05-28 21:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-28 20:03 ` Arjan van de Ven
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-28 23:37 Nakajima, Jun
2004-05-28 22:05 Nakajima, Jun
2004-05-28 22:54 ` Andi Kleen
2004-05-29 1:27 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-29 10:06 ` Andi Kleen
2004-05-29 10:10 ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-29 11:18 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] <20Uhn-7bP-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20UqZ-7i7-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-05-28 21:45 ` Andi Kleen
2004-05-28 18:20 Nakajima, Jun
2004-05-28 18:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-28 18:44 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-28 18:57 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-28 19:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-29 8:38 ` michael
2004-05-29 8:41 ` michael
2004-05-29 8:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-27 3:48 Thomas Zehetbauer
2004-05-27 5:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-27 16:36 ` Thomas Zehetbauer
2004-05-27 16:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-27 21:37 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-05-27 17:03 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-05-27 22:36 ` Thomas Zehetbauer
2004-05-28 5:57 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040528175724.GC9898@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.