All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: michael@optusnet.com.au
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
	"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for AMD64?
Date: 29 May 2004 18:41:46 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1zn7r7hh1.fsf@mo.optusnet.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040528184411.GE9898@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 11:33:32AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
[...]
> > Also, we may well have more than 1 CPU's worth of traffic to
> > process in a large network server.
> 
> One NIC? I've yet to see that ;)

Oh, and another corner case. 

Say you have a cpu-bound process on an SMP box.
Say you're also using a large chunk of a CPU processing
interrupts from a single IRQ.

What stops the cpu-bound process being scheduled onto
the same CPU as the interrupt handlers?

Now you've got one idle CPU, and one seriously overloaded
CPU.

Michael.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-29  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-28 18:20 CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for AMD64? Nakajima, Jun
2004-05-28 18:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-28 18:44   ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-28 18:57     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-28 19:01       ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-29  8:38     ` michael
2004-05-29  8:41     ` michael [this message]
2004-05-29  8:45       ` Arjan van de Ven
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-28 23:37 Nakajima, Jun
2004-05-28 22:05 Nakajima, Jun
2004-05-28 22:54 ` Andi Kleen
2004-05-29  1:27   ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-29 10:06     ` Andi Kleen
2004-05-29 10:10       ` Nick Piggin
2004-05-29 11:18         ` Andi Kleen
     [not found] <20Uhn-7bP-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <20UqZ-7i7-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-05-28 21:45   ` Andi Kleen
2004-05-28 17:09 Nakajima, Jun
2004-05-28 17:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-28 17:45   ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-28 17:46   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-05-28 17:57     ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-28 19:51       ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-05-28 19:58         ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-28 20:14           ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-05-28 21:45             ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-28 20:03         ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-27  3:48 Thomas Zehetbauer
2004-05-27  5:13 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-05-27 16:36   ` Thomas Zehetbauer
2004-05-27 16:50     ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-05-27 21:37       ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-05-27 17:03     ` Anton Blanchard
2004-05-27 22:36       ` Thomas Zehetbauer
2004-05-28  5:57         ` Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1zn7r7hh1.fsf@mo.optusnet.com.au \
    --to=michael@optusnet.com.au \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.